New York AG “takes exception” to Trump’s bond in fraud case


New York AG “takes exception” to Trump’s bond in fraud case | Insurance Business America

“There are critical questions on if this bond was correctly posted,” professional says

New York AG "takes exception" to Trump's bond in fraud case

Insurance News

Ryan Smith

The $175 million surety bond posted by former president Donald Trump to attraction his fraud judgment is lacking key data often included in such bonds, in keeping with the New York legal professional common.

However, the surety bond offered by Knight Specialty is lacking data usually included in such bonds, in keeping with a report by CBS News. Among the lacking data is a monetary assertion from Knight SPecialty, a certificates of qualification from the New York Department of Financial Services, and knowledge associated to energy of legal professional for the bond supplier.

New York Attorney General Letitia James filed paperwork with the courtroom Thursday saying that her workplace “takes exception to the sufficiency of the surety.” James’s submitting mentioned that Knight Specialty was not an admitted provider in New York and doesn’t have the certificates of qualification required by state insurance coverage regulation, CBS News reported.

Donald Trump didn’t publish money for his bond.

In reality, AG Letitia James filed that the corporate who did, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, didn’t even trouble giving them the certificates that they have been even certified to publish it for him.

She’s now asking them to take action. Otherwise…

— Art Candee 🍿🥤 (@ArtCandee) April 4, 2024

Trump legal professional Christopher Kise advised CBS News that James’s submitting was “another witch hunt” and an effort to “stir up” a “baseless public quarrel.”

Trump’s aspect has 10 days to file a movement to “justify” the bond, in keeping with CBS News. This would require Knight Specialty to show that it’s financially able to paying the bond.

Attorney Bruce H. Lederman advised CBS News that he was struck by a number of “glaring errors” within the bond.

“In all the years I’ve been doing this, you always have to have a certificate from the Department of Financial Services saying that you’re licensed to issue a surety bond,” Lederman mentioned.

On Wednesday, the New York Supreme Court clerk’s workplace returned the bond to Trump’s authorized workforce “for correction,” though no specifics have been publicly launched, CBS News reported. Knight Specialty refiled the posting on Thursday earlier than James filed her exception to the bond.

Adam Pollock, a former assistant legal professional common in New York, additionally questioned whether or not the bond was ample.

“This bond is deficient for a number of reasons, including that the company doesn’t appear to be licensed in New York and doesn’t appear to have enough capital to make this undertaking,” Pollock advised CBS News.

The firm doesn’t seem to satisfy the state’s requirement that prohibits firms from placing greater than 10% of their capital in danger, CBS News reported.

However, Knight Insurance president Amit Shah mentioned the restriction doesn’t apply in Knight’s case.

“Knight Specialty Insurance Company is not a New York domestic insurer, and New York surplus lines laws do not regulate the solvency of non-New York excess lines insurers, so we don’t believe we need the 10% surplus,” he advised CBS News.

Shah mentioned Knight has greater than $1 billion in fairness.

However, Lederman advised the information outlet that the “underlying case” was concerning the state AG “requiring strict compliance with the law”

“The law requires an insurance company posting a surety bond to be authorized in New York,” he mentioned. “And there are serious questions about if this bond was properly posted.”

Have one thing to say about this story? Let us know within the feedback beneath.

Related Stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here