Is Housing Health Care? State Medicaid Programs Increasingly Say ‘Yes’


States are plowing billions of {dollars} right into a high-stakes well being care experiment that’s exploding across the nation: utilizing scarce public medical health insurance cash to supply housing for the poorest and sickest Americans.

California goes the largest, pumping $12 billion into an bold Medicaid initiative largely to assist homeless sufferers discover housing, pay for it, and keep away from eviction. Arizona is allocating $550 million in Medicaid funding primarily to cowl six months of lease for homeless individuals. Oregon is spending greater than $1 billion on providers reminiscent of emergency rental help for sufferers dealing with homelessness. Even ruby-red Arkansas will dedicate almost $100 million partly to deal with its neediest.

At least 19 states are directing cash from Medicaid — the state-federal medical health insurance program for low-income individuals — into housing assist and addressing the nation’s rising homelessness epidemic, in keeping with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Even although there’s little settlement that it will present a long-term repair for weak sufferers’ well being or housing, the Biden administration is encouraging different states to leap in. Several are within the pipeline, together with Tennessee, West Virginia, and Montana — and New York received the inexperienced gentle from the federal authorities in January.

Using well being care funding to deal with individuals is “a big philosophical debate,” mentioned Alex Demyan, assistant director of Arizona’s Medicaid company. “We know health care can’t solve all the problems, but we also know that housing agencies are maxed out and we have enormous need to help stabilize people.”

Homelessness jumped 12% within the U.S. final 12 months, to an estimated 653,104 Americans, the best stage on report, even because the nation dramatically elevated its stock of everlasting housing and short-term shelter beds.

As individuals languish on the streets, typically scuffling with habit, extreme psychological sickness, and untreated power ailments, well being care officers and political leaders are turning to medical health insurance cash for aid. They argue that housing assist will enhance well being and save taxpayer cash by maintaining individuals out of establishments reminiscent of nursing houses, hospitals, and jails.

But proof supporting this argument is combined.

For occasion, in a trial by researchers on the University of California-San Francisco, homeless individuals in Santa Clara County, California, who have been randomly assigned to obtain long-term housing and providers used the psychiatric emergency division 38% lower than a management group over 4 years whereas growing their use of routine psychological well being care. But individuals have been nonetheless hospitalized at excessive charges and continued to depend on the emergency room for routine medical care or relaxation.

State Medicaid packages have lengthy dabbled in housing, however with the blessing and encouragement of the Biden administration, they’re launching extra providers for extra individuals with heaps of recent state and federal cash. The development is a part of a broader White House technique that encourages Medicaid administrators to supply social providers alongside conventional medical care, with the purpose of constructing their residents more healthy.

“A health care dollar can do more than just pay for a doctor visit or hospital stay,” Xavier Becerra, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, advised KFF Health News. “We should be using the federal health care dollar for wellness care: Get them before they get ill, and keep them healthy. Is there anyone who would deny that someone who is homeless is going to have a harder time also keeping their health up than someone who is housed with running water and heat?”

Becerra acknowledged these initiatives as experiments. But he mentioned the federal authorities can not ignore the rampant loss of life and illness that’s plaguing homeless populations across the U.S.

“We’re simply saying, ‘State, if you can prove to us that with this Medicaid dollar you will improve someone’s health or health outcome, then you have essentially served the purpose of the Medicaid program and you’re saving taxpayers more money,’” he mentioned.

But not all well being care leaders — and even homelessness consultants — consider that is one of the best use of Medicaid cash, particularly by a safety-net program that faces routine criticism for failing to supply fundamental well being care to many enrollees.

“If you’re on Medicaid, you often have to wait months and months for a specialty visit, even if it’s a life-threatening concern, so I worry about what people won’t be able to get because of this,” mentioned Margot Kushel, a number one homelessness researcher and first care physician at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center who primarily treats low-income sufferers.

“It’s not that I don’t want the money to be spent, but is it best spent in health care?” she requested. “It’s much better than nothing, but it’s far from providing the long-term housing and stability that people really need.”

Kushel mentioned the hazard is that the majority Medicaid housing help can be utilized solely as soon as or is time-limited, reminiscent of rental funds, which generally finish after six months.

“By the time folks get into housing, they’re already really, really sick,” she mentioned. “What happens at the end of six months when rental assistance like free rent runs out?”

Housing as Health Care

Across the nation, state Medicaid packages are stretching the definition of well being care and moving into the enterprise of social providers, delivering a spread of nontraditional advantages reminiscent of wholesome home-delivered meals for sufferers with diabetes and air filters for sufferers with bronchial asthma.

While the federal authorities historically has banned the usage of Medicaid cash for direct lease funds, that has modified.

In 2022, Arizona obtained federal approval for an initiative known as “H2O,” which can prioritize homeless individuals and people vulnerable to dropping housing who even have a psychological well being situation and power sickness. When it launches in October, it’s going to primarily present two providers: lease funds for as much as six months; and transitional housing, which might embody shelters with intensive providers.

Arizona noticed a 5% bounce in homelessness in 2023 from the earlier 12 months. Its program will complement a separate state-funded Medicaid initiative that gives 3,000 lease vouchers for individuals in southern Arizona who’ve a extreme psychological sickness and are homeless or vulnerable to changing into homeless. About 5,000 individuals are on the ready listing for a voucher.

“We’ve seen such positive health outcomes and cost reductions as a result, so it made total sense to us to expand our work in that space,” Demyan mentioned. That program slashed ER visits 45% and decreased hospital inpatient admissions 53% on the six-month mark after sufferers began receiving providers, whereas growing less expensive preventive care 56% and saving $4,300 per member, per 30 days, according to state information.

California, residence to just about 30% of the nation’s homeless inhabitants, noticed an almost 6% bounce in homelessness in 2023, to about 181,000 individuals.

The state launched its large CalAIM initiative in 2022 to supply all kinds of social providers to a small sliver of the state’s roughly 15 million Medicaid enrollees. A big share of the sources are going to housing providers for homeless individuals or these dealing with eviction, reminiscent of protecting safety deposits and enlisting case managers to hunt for obtainable residences. State leaders are additionally asking the Biden administration for permission to supply six months of lease.

“If you’re saddled with a great deal of either physical or behavioral health conditions, whether it’s diabetes or HIV, high blood pressure or schizophrenia, without housing, it’s really hard to stabilize those conditions,” mentioned Mark Ghaly, secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency.

But he cautioned that Medicaid’s core focus should stay getting individuals wholesome, even when they’re dwelling exterior, which is a monumental and costly problem as a result of situations like diabetes, coronary heart illness, and HIV require steady remedy and infrequently a number of drugs.

“I do not think that health care is responsible for solving homelessness in California or anywhere else,” Ghaly mentioned. “But if housing instability or lack of housing is one of the key drivers getting in the way of being healthy, then absolutely we need to pay attention to it.”

Health insurers that present Medicaid protection in California can select whether or not to supply housing providers, however Oregon is requiring Medicaid insurers to take action.

Homelessness grew 12% in Oregon from 2022 to 2023, however the state is focusing on sufferers vulnerable to changing into homeless. Participants shall be eligible for six months of lease and different providers when this system launches in November, mentioned Dave Baden, deputy director of the Oregon Health Authority.

“We’re really trying to focus on people teetering on the brink,” Baden mentioned. “If you’re already homeless, you really need longer, sustainable housing dollars to keep that person housed.”

It’s not simply states experimenting with this method. Kaiser Permanente is without doubt one of the well being techniques that has invested its personal funds into housing. In latest years, the well being care big has dedicated a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to assist keep or construct hundreds of reasonably priced housing models, along with offering housing-related Medicaid advantages for its members.

“We have to do something. The crisis is out of control,” mentioned Bechara Choucair, its chief well being officer.

Mission Creep

Sherry Glied, a professor at New York University and former Obama administration official who’s an knowledgeable in well being care economics, warned in a latest well being coverage evaluation of mission creep in well being care. She cautioned that well being care establishments moving into the enterprise of social providers could possibly be a “dangerous distraction.”

Glied pointed to at the least 57 well being techniques and 917 hospitals across the nation which have launched social service initiatives, with most specializing in housing. Because many establishments battle to fulfill affected person security and high quality care requirements, Glied argued that they need to as a substitute enhance fundamental care and depart housing to social service organizations “that specialize in this work.”

“Providing people with food or housing is pretty far removed from the core mission of health care,” she advised KFF Health News.

Peter Lee, one other former Obama administration official and the founding govt director of California’s Obamacare trade, mentioned well being care suppliers ought to think about providing some housing and social providers, however he fears such initiatives could divert cash from conventional medication and stop sufferers from getting enough care.

“In the past five to 10 years, there has been a lot of recognition that health is about much more than actual health care. Very true,” Lee mentioned. “The question is how do you address those issues while health care itself is not doing too great. The brass tacks of this is making sure people with diabetes have great diabetes care, that people get checkups in time, that people can get the regular health care they need.”

State Medicaid packages, which give care to at the least 80 million Americans, typically battle to ship fundamental medical providers, reminiscent of childhood dental visits and breast most cancers screenings. In California, the state spending probably the most on housing providers, kids on Medicaid didn’t have well timed entry to look after psychological well being or substance use in 2022, in keeping with an audit revealed in November.

Despite these shortfalls, many of the states which have been given the federal go-ahead to experiment with housing providers have secured funding for 5 years. California is among the many states that hope to make the advantages everlasting.

Though a Republican presidency might interrupt this development, states say they’re dedicated — even when their initiatives don’t move a conventional cost-benefit evaluation.

“The singular focus on a financial return on investment is not as clear as it was previously,” mentioned Cindy Mann, a federal Medicaid director beneath Obama.

“States are just seeing how little sense it makes to treat people and then release them back to the streets without the support they need.”

This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially unbiased service of the California Health Care Foundation. 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here