Pfizer’s Financial Supernova and the Art of Really Big Lies

0
166
Pfizer’s Financial Supernova and the Art of Really Big Lies


The manufactured COVID pandemic has been a proverbial golden egg-laying goose for Pfizer. Its annual income is predicted to succeed in $101.3 billion in 2022,1 due to its COVID jab, which doesn’t forestall an infection or unfold, and Paxlovid, an ineffective and harmful COVID antiviral that causes rebound. It could be comical if it weren’t so egregious.

And, Pfizer’s coffers are kind of assured to proceed being crammed to the brim because the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has now added COVID-19 photographs to the U.S. childhood, adolescent and grownup vaccine schedules.2

With this motion, the CDC has secured Pfizer’s (and Moderna’s) everlasting legal responsibility defend in order that nobody can sue them for damages for accidents and deaths occurring because of the photographs. It additionally opens the door for states to mandate the jab for college youngsters, which ensures a steady income stream.

That income stream could even exceed earlier income, as Pfizer raised the value on its COVID jab by about 400%,3 from $304 per jab to someplace between $110 and $130, on the identical day ACIP voted so as to add the shot to the vaccine schedule. That worth hike will take impact as soon as the present U.S. buy program expires.

Pfizer Hunts for the Next Blockbuster

As reported by Kaiser Health News (KHN),5 “a fortune amassed in the COVID pandemic is now paving the path to pharma nirvana: a weight loss pill likely worth hundreds of billions.” Pfizer can be hoping to develop blockbuster medication for diabetes, migraines, ulcerative colitis, prostate most cancers and sickle cell illness, and is gobbling up smaller drug corporations with promising product portfolios.

A blockbuster drug could rake in billions, however that doesn’t imply it’s a blockbuster within the sense that it’s efficient, as we’ve seen with Paxlovid and the mRNA COVID shot. Pfizer will get round this largely by being a “remarkable marketing machine,” to cite Timothy Calkins, a professor of promoting at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.6

Not solely is Pfizer spending massive bucks on splashy promoting, in addition they work with contract analysis corporations like ICON, which run medical analysis trials for drug corporations and federal companies alike, thereby giving the drug corporations the within monitor on drug approvals.7,8

Pfizer additionally will get loads of free assist from the federal authorities which, within the case of COVID, coerced thousands and thousands with job loss threats into getting the photographs, and carried out guidelines that guarantee hospitals and pharmacies will solely prescribe sure COVID medication, Paxlovid being one in every of them.

The Art of Really Big Lies

In a November 4, 2022, article,9 medical and public well being doctor Dr. David Bell discusses the artwork — and worth — of mendacity, noting that the extra divorced a lie is from actuality, the extra possible it’s to succeed, due to the quirks of human nature and regular psychology:

“In a former position I had a boss who lied loads. The lies had been pure fantasy, however large in scope and delivered with sincerity. They had been very profitable.

This success was based mostly on the reluctance of most individuals to contemplate that somebody able of authority in a humanitarian group would fully ignore all semblance of actuality. People assumed the claims have to be true as fabricating data to that extent in these circumstances appeared to defy logic.

The precept of Really Big Lies relies on the lies being so divorced from actuality that the listener will assume their very own notion have to be flawed, somewhat than doubt the claims of the particular person telling the lies. Only an insane or ridiculous particular person would make such outlandish claims, and a reputable establishment wouldn’t make use of such an individual.

Therefore, on condition that the establishment is seemingly credible, the statements should even be credible, and the listener’s prior notion of actuality was subsequently flawed. Lesser lies, against this, are more likely to be perceived as sufficiently near recognized actuality to be demonstrably unsuitable. Inventing reality will be more practical than bending it.”

I imagine that is exactly the technique employed by Big Pharma, well being companies, authorities officers and the deep state propaganda arm over the previous three years. Their claims have been so removed from any semblance of actuality, anybody conscious of the info has been left feeling greater than a little bit loopy.

Unfortunately, whereas most people have a ethical and moral compass, few find yourself following it when confronted by psychopaths in authority and the peer stress to adapt. As famous by Bell, good staff gamers nearly all the time find yourself supporting false narratives, and people who refuse to go together with what are clearly lies are usually however a tiny minority.

Profit Through Deception

For many years, patient-centered well being care has been the norm, and sufferers not solely had the fitting, however the responsibility, to take part within the planning and implementation of their care. This was enshrined within the 1978 Declaration of Alma Ata10 — a declaration adopted by the World Health Organization “as the key to achieving an acceptable level of health throughout the world.”

However, as famous by Bell, centralized top-down well being care is way extra engaging to Big Pharma traders. The main impediment to the corporatization and monetization of public well being was reality, and this impediment was lastly (and formidably) overcome throughout the COVID pandemic. Bell explains:11

“COVID-19 proved that even this obstacle to progress will be expunged by way of constant mendacity and the vilification of truth-tellers, backed by a well-managed behavioral psychology marketing campaign.

This pandemic response supplied a template not just for vastly-increased company earnings, however for job certainty and growth of alternative for the military of mostly-Western bureaucrats and well being professionals filling the workplaces, assembly rooms and business-class seats of its implementing organizations. COVID-19 made company colonialism respectable once more.

Superficially, COVID-19 seems a poor illness option to facilitate a elementary societal reset.

Death is closely concentrated in previous age … Severe circumstances are usually confined to these with life expectations already shortened by metabolic ailments … Countries that did not implement measures to limit and impoverish their folks … had COVID-19 outcomes comparable to those who opted for lockdowns and different trappings of medical fascism.

Average hospital admissions within the UK and USA declined throughout the pandemic, not what the general public expects when a pathogen wreaks havoc. Lockdowns devastated economies … COVID vaccines have additionally been unhelpful as excessive vaccination charges did not noticeably affect an infection and transmission …

Thus, COVID-19 supplied a tough bucket of info to cope with, however that is simply the scenario by which Really Big Lies can work. These had been wanted each to idiot the general public, and to offer a construction inside which well being professionals may implement the coverage.

Largely by taking part in on concern, divorcing knowledge from context, and disseminating false data broadly and incessantly, an entire new perception system has been constructed in public well being to exchange the evidence-based orthodoxy of former years.

Reality has been changed with dogma so divorced from any foundation actually that it’s simpler to go along with the propaganda than cope with the dissonance that will in any other case outcome.”

The New Fantasy-Based Dogmas

The new fantasy-based beliefs that well being care employees, sufferers, researchers, teachers and public well being staff at the moment are compelled to embrace embody the next, quoted from Bell’s article:12

  • Disease burden needs to be measured in uncooked mortality, and never embody metrics akin to life-years misplaced. Hence an 85-year-old dying of a respiratory virus is equal to a 5-year-old dying of malaria by way of burden and urgency;
  • Medium and long-term harms resulting from poverty and decreased healthcare entry shouldn’t be thought-about when assessing the worth of an intervention. A modelled impact on the goal pathogen is the one related metric;
  • It is acceptable to misinform the general public on age-related threat and relative illness burden and higher to instill concern with the intention to obtain compliance with public-health directives;
  • Growth of viral transmission in a neighborhood follows an exponential curve, somewhat than a gradual deceleration (e.g. Gompertz curve) because the proportion of recovered (immune) folks accumulate;
  • Banning college students from college for a 12 months protects the aged, whereas not locking in generational poverty;
  • Cloth and surgical masks cease aerosolized virus transmission, and all meta-analyses of randomized management trials (that present minimal or no impact) needs to be ignored;
  • Post-infection immunity to respiratory viruses is predicted to be poor and short-lived, while vaccines to a single viral protein will one way or the other produce a lot stronger immunity;
  • Immunity to viruses is finest measured by antibody concentrations somewhat than T-cell response or medical outcomes;
  • Informed consent for vaccination mustn’t embody data on demonstrated dangers, as this might promote ‘vaccine hesitancy’;
  • It is acceptable to offer a brand new gene-based pharmaceutical class in being pregnant that crosses the placenta with none being pregnant trial knowledge, toxicology research, or long-term outcomes knowledge (in anybody);
  • Irrespective of the Convention on the Rights of the Child ‘In all actions concerning children … the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration,’ it’s acceptable to inject youngsters with medication missing long-term security knowledge with the intention to defend the aged;
  • Pandemics have gotten extra frequent and extra lethal, regardless of the historic report, and the progress of recent medication, indicating fairly the alternative.

Refusing the False Narratives Has Real Consequences

As Bell accurately factors out, these new public well being positions will not be simply barely incorrect. They’re all “either unethical or clear nonsense, contradicted by prior public health orthodoxy.” Indeed, most are classical Orwellian doublespeak and 180 levels from the reality.

But it’s the sharp break from factual actuality that makes it not possible to query them as a result of, for those who do, you’re now questioning “the entire current hierarchy of public health,” Bell says.

To quote Dr. Anthony Fauci, you’re not attacking him whenever you query his irrational flip-flopping, you’re questioning science itself. If you query any of those fantasy-based beliefs, you’re now a science-denier, and also you’re placing your employment and popularity in danger. Unfortunately, these dangers will not be imaginary.

The punishment for refusing these false narratives could be very actual and really extreme. Many medical doctors and scientists whose reputations and contributions to public well being have been past reproach for many years have been stripped of their medical licenses and misplaced their jobs for talking out towards these COVID fallacies.

So, the place will we go from right here? How will we finish the insanity and return to reality-based public well being?

“Whilst growing their industry’s finances, public health professionals are degrading themselves and betraying society,” Bell writes.13 “The betrayal, based mostly on incessant mendacity, is one thing for which they are going to inevitably face penalties …

Eventually, even essentially the most devoted followers will start to query the sense of placing on a masks at a restaurant door solely to take away it 10 steps later, or vaccinating huge populations towards a illness to which they’re already immune while they die of different readily preventable ailments.

The method out of that is merely to refuse to lie, or cowl for the lies of others … [The] reality will catch up, someday, with those that don’t … It is much better to go away early and stay with dignity.”

Evil Genius: Creating the Market

If you’re paying consideration, you’ve undoubtedly observed that many drug corporations, Pfizer specifically, are within the enterprise of making their very own markets. Pfizer launched a COVID jab that neither protects towards an infection nor prevents unfold, thereby necessitating a number of boosters. Its antiviral COVID drug Paxlovid causes rebound, necessitating a number of doses.

Now we discover that the COVID jabs are additionally related to elevated charges of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) an infection in youngsters, and like clockwork, Pfizer and Moderna begin engaged on RSV jabs. The CDC additionally aids by recommending children get extra COVID photographs. Is this a racket or what!?

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) is now demanding solutions from the CDC in regards to the low season spike in RSV charges,14 which mysteriously arose within the wake of childhood injections towards COVID.

Moderna’s pediatric COVID jab trial confirmed those that acquired the jab had larger charges of RSV than the placebo group. RSV was additionally one of many main severe uncomfortable side effects in Pfizer’s pediatric trial. Now, abruptly, we’re seeing out-of-season RSV spikes in youngsters. Coincidence? Make them show it. In a authorized replace, ICAN stories:

“The challenge is so severe that even the FDA’s vaccine committee, VRBPAC, which usually cheerleads even essentially the most harmful vaccine, famous the correlation and ‘stressed the importance of continued post-authorization safety surveillance, in particular for … certain respiratory infections (RSV and pneumonia) in the youngest age group …’15

Despite the famous significance of surveilling RSV post-authorization, nobody at CDC or FDA appears to be drawing a connection between the rise in RSV and the COVID-19 vaccines being administered to youngsters.

Incredibly, the CDC simply issued an ‘Official Health Advisory’16 in regards to the enhance RSV and respiratory virus circumstances and, in it, the CDC recommends all people 6 months and up obtain an influenza vaccine and a COVID-19 vaccine!

Not surprisingly, the press has missed the mark, too. While there are quite a few articles detailing the troubling enhance in sick youngsters, none reference COVID-19 vaccination regardless of the information from the producers’ trials.

To unravel this, on October 26, 2022, ICAN’s attorneys despatched a letter17 to the CDC observing the medical trial knowledge displaying a correlation between elevated RSV circumstances and receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine. ICAN’s letter demanded to know the proportion of youngsters who examined optimistic for RSV and who had obtained a COVID-19 vaccine previous to their RSV analysis.”

Study Calls for Reevaluation of Jab Campaigns

In associated information, we even have a November 2022 examine18 in Nature Communications, which questions the rationale of present booster campaigns. According to the authors:

“An vital facet of vaccine effectiveness is its affect on pathogen transmissibility, harboring main implications for public well being insurance policies. As viral load is a distinguished issue affecting infectivity, its laboratory surrogate, qRT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), can be utilized to analyze the infectivity-related element of vaccine effectiveness …

By analyzing outcomes of greater than 460,000 people, we present that whereas current vaccination reduces Omicron viral load, its impact wanes quickly. In distinction, a considerably slower waning fee is demonstrated for recovered COVID-19 people.

Thus, whereas the vaccine is efficient in reducing morbidity and mortality, its comparatively small impact on transmissibility of Omicron (as measured right here by Ct) and its speedy waning name for reassessment of future booster campaigns.”

Considering the theoretical safety of those photographs final for simply 70 days (in line with this examine), are the dangers related to the photographs actually value it? So far, a number of risk-benefit analyses have all come to the conclusion that the dangers far outweigh any potential profit.

Unfortunately, it appears we’ve got to depend on scientists outdoors the U.S. to do this sort of bench science, as all we appear get from American analysis establishments are analyses of learn how to get “anti-vaxxers” to purchase the false narrative and roll up their sleeves.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here