In the video above, John Campbell, Ph.D., a retired nurse educator, evaluations the proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), which is the instrument that empowers the World Health Organization to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
If these amendments undergo, nevertheless, the WHO might be empowered to do a complete lot greater than that. It will grow to be the de facto governing physique of all member states, together with the U.S.
Now, in accordance with so-called “fact checkers,” the WHO could have no authority to dictate U.S. well being coverage beneath the amended IHR or the proposed pandemic treaty, nor will nations be stripped of their sovereignty.1 But they’re utterly fallacious. The solely motive they’re denying these truths is as a result of they don’t need the general public to stress authorities to reject these proposals, as they need to.
As famous by Campbell and others, together with bioweapons professional Francis Boyle, Ph.D., and researcher James Roguski,2 the pandemic treaty and the IHR amendments are clearly written by specialists in each nationwide and worldwide regulation and seem “airtight.”
There’s merely little doubt that, as at the moment written, these devices might be legally binding and can supersede native and nationwide legal guidelines. They even embody enforcement instruments to make sure that member nations adjust to the WHO’s edicts.
Another false propaganda angle is that these devices solely apply to infectious illness pandemics, however that isn’t true both. Areas of life which can be being added in beneath the umbrella of “health” embody local weather, meals manufacturing and even poverty, so the WHO will be capable of declare sole world authority over something to do with these points as nicely.
In his video, Campbell goes by means of a number of of the proposed IHR amendments, and the way they may influence nationwide sovereignty and public well being choices. The article-by-article compilation of the proposed amendments3 could be discovered right here.
Strikethroughs within the textual content point out that the textual content is to be deleted, and the additions or revisions are underlined in daring. The following are among the most disconcerting amendments, copied with the deletions and insertions of textual content displaying.
New IHR Will Be Binding and Can Apply to Anything
Article 1 Definitions — “‘standing recommendation’ means
non-bindingrecommendation issued by WHO for particular ongoing public well being dangers pursuant to Article 16 concerning acceptable well being measures for routine or periodic software wanted to forestall or scale back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide site visitors;
‘temporary recommendation’ means
non-bindingrecommendation issued by WHO pursuant to Article 15 for software on a time-limited, risk-specific foundation, in response to a public well being emergency of worldwide concern, in order to forestall or scale back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide site visitors.”
Since the phrase “non-binding” is eliminated, which means that any suggestion from the WHO might be binding and member states might be required to comply with the WHO’s suggestions.
Article 2 Scope and Purpose — “The function and scope of those Regulations are to forestall, shield towards, put together, management and supply a public well being response to the worldwide unfold of illnesss together with by means of well being techniques readiness and resilience in methods which can be commensurate with and restricted to
public well being danger
all dangers with a possible to influence public well being, and which keep away from pointless interference with worldwide site visitors
andcommerce, livelihoods, human rights, and equitable entry to well being merchandise and well being care applied sciences and understand how.”
This actually opens the door for the WHO to take over for almost any motive. It doesn’t even need to be an actual public well being risk. It might be a possible, unproven or suspected risk.
Human Dignity, Rights and Freedoms Will Not Be Factored In
Article 3 Principles — “The implementation of these Regulations shall be
with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of personsbased on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.”
In different phrases, bodily autonomy and private selection are being changed by one-size-fits-all drugs that has no regard for human dignity, human rights or basic freedoms. The proper to a lot as an opinion may even be eliminated on the nationwide stage.
Article 10 Verification — “If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours , WHO
mayshall , when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned.”
So, if the WHO suspects that an outbreak inside a nation may pose a global risk, however the nation in query doesn’t need to collaborate with the WHO, the WHO will instantly inform the opposite members concerning the suspected risk, which is able to put stress on the uncooperative nation, and the views of that nation might be deemed irrelevant.
Other amendments inside this and different articles additionally particularly take away any involvement of the nation within the WHO’s decision-making. Article 13 beneath is however one instance. As famous by Campbell, the director-general is repeatedly specified as the only real authority in relation to making assessments and choices. The director-general also can impose sanctions on nations that refuse to comply with his dictates.4
How can a single individual be given the authority to make choices for all the world? This form of authoritarian top-down system can solely injury public well being, as public well being is finest served by native choice makers which have entry to native knowledge.
Director-General Can Act Unilaterally on Mere Suspicion
Article 12 Determination of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern, or Intermediate Health Alert — “If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring, the Director-General shall notify all States Parties and seek to consult with the State Party in whose territory the event arises regarding this preliminary determination …”
The key drawback right here is the addition of “potential or actual.” The WHO can take over if the director-general has a mere suspicion {that a} well being emergency is perhaps brewing. The risk doesn’t need to be actual or evident.
Article 13 Public Health Response — “
At the request of a State Party,WHO shallcollaboratearticulate clearly defined assistance to a State Party offer assistance to a State Party in the response to public health risks and other events by providing technical guidance , health products, technologies, know-how, deployment of civil medical personals, and assistance and by assessing the effectiveness of the control measures in place, including the mobilization of international teams of experts for on-site assistance …”
Again, enter from the member state is not going to be accepted. It’s now not about collaborating with the WHO on well being emergencies. It’s about obeying it. The WHO will independently determine what’s to be finished. The WHO can also ship in its personal medical personnel to handle the scenario.
Newly Added Articles
Several new articles have additionally been added to flesh out and describe the WHO’s authority, and what member states should do to adjust to this new top-down order. Here are two telling ones.
NEW Article 13A WHO Led International Public Health Response — “States [sic] Parties recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern and undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response.”
In different phrases, member nations shall bow all the way down to the WHO and do as they’re advised. A newly added Article 53 goes on to element how every member nation should implement a compliance committee to make sure the WHO’s directives are adhered to and executed.
New Article 13A Access to Health Products, Technologies and Know-How for Public Health Response — “1. Immediately after the dedication of a public well being emergency of worldwide concern beneath Article 12, the Director General shall make a right away evaluation of availability and affordability of required well being merchandise and make suggestions, together with an allocation mechanism, to keep away from any potential shortages of well being merchandise and applied sciences …
3. States Parties shall present, of their mental property legal guidelines and associated legal guidelines and laws, exemptions and limitations to the unique rights of mental property holders to facilitate the manufacture, export and import of the required well being merchandise, together with their supplies and parts.”
So, as soon as a PHEIC is introduced, the director-general will lay declare to all medical assets inside the member states. Other additions additionally spell out that the WHO will management:5
|
The native manufacturing of well being merchandise |
Intellectual property |
|
Cell traces used within the manufacturing of biotherapeutics and vaccines |
Allocation of medical assets |
|
Biosurveillance |
Development of regulatory pointers for the fast-tracking of well being merchandise |
|
Censorship of “false and unreliable information” about public well being occasions, preventive methods and pandemic countermeasures |
A world well being database (which is required for the implementation of vaccine passports) |
IHR Amendment Greenlights Conflicts of Interest
The amendments additionally plainly permit for conflicts of curiosity which may hurt public well being. Under Article 9, the WHO can declare a public well being emergency primarily based on data from undisclosed sources. Those sources might embody Big Pharma, WHO funders such because the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, or any variety of different gamers with conflicts of curiosity.
As reported by The Defender,6 “One of the biggest changes the WHO has seen in its 75-year history is a shift from funding from sovereign nations to funding from private parties.”
At current, the vast majority of the WHO’s funding comes from Bill Gates, by means of donations from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). Gates additionally funds the World Economic Forum, and his nonprofits are taking cash from drug corporations.
What this implies is that Gates and drug corporations wield monumental energy over the WHO. It’s not even near being unbiased. A majority of the WHO’s funding can also be “specified,” which means it’s earmarked for explicit applications. So, the WHO can’t allocate these funds wherever they’re wanted most, and this additionally massively influences what the WHO does and the way it does it.
There’s no getting round this level: The WHO is a corporation that does no matter its funders need it to do, and that doesn’t bode nicely for world well being, contemplating medical errors are already a number one explanation for dying, and have been for many years. The IHR amendments mainly open the door broad to mass medical experimentation on humanity with out knowledgeable consent, and if the COVID pandemic is any indication, nothing good will come from that.
PHEIC Definition Expanded to Include Just About Anything
The amendments additionally radically increase the conditions that may represent a PHEIC. A PHEIC is at the moment outlined as an “extraordinary event” in a single nation that constitutes “a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response.”
Amendments search to increase and broaden this definition to incorporate issues like clusters of an infection with potential however unverified human-to-human transmission. The precise dangers of such clusters don’t even must be evaluated. What’s extra, the proposed definition of a PHEIC doesn’t specify that it should contain “severe” or “life-threatening” illness, so it might be invoked for absolutely anything.
One of the amendments additionally suggests giving the director-general the flexibility to declare an “intermediate public health alert” when the scenario doesn’t totally meet the PHEIC standards. In such an occasion, the director-general and/or a regional WHO director would be capable of declare a public well being emergency of regional concern (PHERC).7
As steered by Campbell, to actually perceive what they’re attempting to do right here, flick thru the Article by Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments8 for your self. Most positively, don’t imagine the “fact checkers” who say there’s nothing to see right here.
Treaty Will Expand WHO’s Power Beyond Pandemics
As talked about earlier, once you add within the proposed pandemic treaty, the WHO’s powers increase even additional, as a result of along with increasing emergency powers throughout pandemics, the treaty additionally emphasizes the “One Health”9,10 agenda, and that covers nearly the whole lot you’ll be able to consider.
As illustrated within the graphic11 beneath, the One Health agenda relies on the premise {that a} broad vary of facets of life and the atmosphere can influence well being and due to this fact fall beneath the “potential” to trigger hurt.
This graphic beneath isn’t complete. The scope of One Health, in accordance with a One Health Commission doc,12 additionally consists of communications, economics, civil society, world commerce, commerce and safety, public coverage and regulation, analysis, noncommunicable ailments, agricultural land use (which entails forcing farmers off their land), catastrophe preparedness and response, illness surveillance, the “human-animal bond” (no matter meaning) and rather more.
Under the brand new treaty, the WHO could have unilateral energy to make choices about all of those areas, and its dictates will supersede and overrule any and all native, state and federal legal guidelines. For instance, beneath One Health, the WHO will be capable of declare local weather change as a well being emergency and implement local weather lockdowns to handle it.
One Health Is Part of The Great Reset Agenda
One Health mainly mirrors The Great Reset agenda. It simply makes use of a distinct identify and justifies all these Great Reset adjustments as a method to “protect health.” Not surprisingly, One Health is financed and promoted by a protracted record of Great Reset backers, together with the United Nations, the European Union and varied U.S. federal businesses,13,14 the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, the Wellcome Trust, UNICEF, CEPI, the World Economic Forum and the World Bank.
But whereas these entities are formally funding the pandemic business, what’s actually occurring is that they’re utilizing taxes to fund rich individuals, who in flip exploit the poor. It’s as removed from philanthropic as you may get.
Taxpayers are offering the cash whereas personal profiteers are deciding how that cash is spent, and it’s being spent in methods that can profit themselves. So, it’s a private-public “partnership” the place the general public is being robbed and all the advantages go to the personal sector.
As reported by Paraschiva Florescu and Rob Verkerk Ph.D., with the Alliance for Natural Health International:15
“The One Health strategy is aligned with WHO’s linear and reductionist considering that seeks to distill all potential options to at least one view of the underlying science, one view on the required medicines, and just one fact.
This monolithic strategy spells grave risks for humanity on condition that it’s bottom-up, decentralized, regionally particular approaches to advanced well being issues which have all the time been proven to work. Top-down, “one size fits all” approaches, particularly ones twisted by conflicted pursuits, are doomed to failure.
Only those that fail to take a look at the broader scientific image are ready to persuade themselves that the WHO’s first world try at managing a pandemic, involving masks, lockdowns and genetic vaccines, was successful.
At its core, the WHO’s prolonged powers will result in much more censorship and can dismantle the notion of consensus science constructed on a clear, scientific technique …
Without a global rebellion by the grassroots, these amendments will go forward. Our silence and passivity are our consent. It is, with out query, a part of the sluggish descent into totalitarianism, taking us additional and additional away from rules and values which have characterised many civilizations over current millennia, specifically the fitting to liberty, the rights of the person, and the significance of nationwide sovereignty.”
To study extra, try the Stop Vax Passports Task Force webinar on One Health,16 obtainable on NTD.com.
Global Threat Detection Network Launched
Already, the WHO has launched a world risk detection community, the International Pathogen Surveillance Network (IPSN), to “help protect people from infectious disease threats through the power of pathogen genomics.”17 Apparently, it totally expects to be granted all of the powers that the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty will impart.
This community might be used to gather and analyze pathogenic samples, which in flip will drive the WHO’s public well being choices. As described in a press launch:18
“The IPSN, with a Secretariat hosted by the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, brings collectively specialists worldwide on the cutting-edge of genomics and knowledge analytics, from governments, philanthropic foundations, multilateral organizations, civil society, academia and the personal sector.
All share a standard objective: to detect and reply to illness threats earlier than they grow to be epidemics and pandemics, and to optimize routine illness surveillance …
COVID-19 highlighted the important function pathogen genomics performs in responding to pandemic threats. Without the speedy sequencing of the SARS-COV-2 genome, vaccines wouldn’t have been as efficient, or have been made obtainable so shortly.
New, extra transmissible variants of the virus wouldn’t have been as shortly recognized. Genomics lies on the coronary heart of efficient epidemic and pandemic preparedness and response, in addition to a part of the continued surveillance of an unlimited vary of ailments, from foodborne ailments and influenza to tuberculosis and HIV.”
The drawback, after all, is that the COVID “vaccines,” developed at warp pace utilizing genomic sequencing, had been neither efficient nor secure. Many have died inside two weeks of getting their jab, and after a number of months, the effectiveness grow to be unfavourable. This is the expertise they now need to use for the whole lot. The dangers shifting this agenda ahead are near-incomprehensible.
So, to summarize and recap, the globalist takeover hinges on the profitable creation of a suggestions loop of surveillance for virus variants, declaration of potential danger adopted by lockdowns and restrictions, adopted by mass vaccinating populations to “end” the pandemic restrictions, adopted by extra surveillance and so forth. The funding for this scheme comes primarily from taxpayers, whereas the income go to firms and their traders.
Current Timeline
Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations could have solely a restricted time to reject them. Any nation that hasn’t formally rejected the amendments will then be legally certain by them, and any try to reject them after the six-month grace interval might be null and void.
As it at the moment stands, the IHR amendments might be voted on within the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2024. They solely want a majority vote to go. If that vote occurs as deliberate, then the 10-month deadline for member states to reject the amendments will expire in March 2025, and the amendments will come into drive in May 2025. If a member state opts out, then the present 2005 IHR model will apply to that state.
The WHO pandemic treaty may even be voted on by the WHA in May 2024. It requires a two-thirds majority vote to go, and 30 member nations to ratify it. Thirty days after ratification, the treaty will take drive for the nations that signed it.
Bill Introduced to Require Senate Approval, however Is It Enough?
Fortunately, the U.S. Senate just isn’t fully clueless concerning the ramifications of this treaty, and 17 Republican senators, led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have launched a invoice to thwart the WHO’s energy seize.19
The “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act,”20 launched February 15, 2023, would require a Senate supermajority (two-thirds or 67 senators) to go the pandemic treaty.
However, in accordance with Boyle,21 an professional on worldwide legal guidelines and treaties, even this invoice won’t be sufficient to guard us had been President Biden to signal the treaty. The motive for it’s because the treaty is written “specifically to circumvent the Senate-approval process.”
A much more efficient technique, he says, can be for Congress to withhold its annual contributions to the WHO — after which withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether.
I imagine it could be price supporting all of those methods. So, please, contact your representatives and urge them to assist the “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act,” to withhold funding for the WHO and, finally, assist U.S. withdrawal from the WHO.