[ad_1]
—Joshua A. Basseches is the David and Jane Flowerree Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies and Public Policy at Tulane University.
The second Trump administration is proving to be extra disastrous for the local weather and the clear power economic system than many had feared.
Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act repealed many of the clear power incentives in former president Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. Meanwhile, his EPA administrator has moved to revoke the endangerment discovering, the authorized foundation for federal oversight of greenhouse gases.
This has left many within the local weather and clear power communities questioning what will we do now? The reply, I might argue, is to return to state capitals—a policymaking venue that local weather and renewable power advocates already know nicely. Read the complete story.
This story is a part of MIT Technology Review’s Heat Exchange visitor opinion sequence, providing skilled commentary on authorized, political and regulatory points associated to local weather change and clear power. You can learn the remainder of the items right here.
Should AI flatter us, repair us, or simply inform us?
How would you like your AI to deal with you?
It’s a critical query, and it’s one which Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, has clearly been chewing on since GPT-5’s bumpy launch at first of the month.
He faces a trilemma. Should ChatGPT flatter us, on the danger of fueling delusions that may spiral out of hand? Or repair us, which requires us to imagine AI generally is a therapist regardless of the proof on the contrary? Or ought to it inform us with chilly, to-the-point responses that will depart customers bored and fewer more likely to keep engaged?
It’s protected to say the corporate has failed to select a lane, and if these are certainly AI’s choices, the rockiness of this newest replace is perhaps as a consequence of Altman believing ChatGPT can juggle all three. Read the complete story.