Texas abortion bans challenged in dramatic courtroom testimony from 3 girls : Shots

0
283
Texas abortion bans challenged in dramatic courtroom testimony from 3 girls : Shots



Samantha Casiano informed a Texas courtroom that she ought to have been in a position to let her daughter, who had anencephaly, “go to relaxation sooner.”

Danielle Villasana for NPR


cover caption

toggle caption

Danielle Villasana for NPR


Samantha Casiano informed a Texas courtroom that she ought to have been in a position to let her daughter, who had anencephaly, “go to relaxation sooner.”

Danielle Villasana for NPR

AUSTIN, Texas – Samantha Casiano, who gave start to a child who lived simply 4 hours, broke down and have become bodily in poor health on the witness stand as she informed the story of her doomed being pregnant in an Austin, Texas, courtroom on Wednesday. Her husband, Luis Villasana, rushed to the entrance of the courtroom to assist her, throughout a listening to in a case difficult the abortion bans in Texas.

Casiano was one in every of three girls who gave dramatic testimony about their pregnancies within the case introduced by the Center for Reproductive Rights. The case, on behalf of 13 sufferers and two docs, argues that the medical exceptions to Texas’ legal guidelines are unclear and unworkable for docs in ways in which hurt sufferers and that the state has executed nothing to make clear its legal guidelines.

In Wednesday’s continuing, which is able to proceed on Thursday, attorneys for Casiano and the opposite plaintiffs requested the decide to briefly droop the bans for individuals who have medical issues of their pregnancies because the case proceeds. State Attorney General Ken Paxton’s workplace is asking for the case to be dismissed.

The benches within the roomy, model new courtroom on the Travis County Civil District Court have been crammed with reporters, plaintiffs, and their supporters, together with a number of husbands. Members of the anti-abortion rights group Texas Alliance for Life have been additionally in attendance.

Eight attorneys represented the sufferers and docs difficult the regulation. On the opposite aspect of the room, two attorneys represented defendant Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Judge Jessica Mangrum, elected as a Democratic judicial candidate in 2020, presided.

During hours of emotional testimony, the courtroom felt tense and quiet. Casiano, who first informed her story to NPR in April, was so overcome as she described her experiences she cried, coughed, choked after which vomited within the witness field. The courtroom was adjourned for a recess at that time.

When it was again in session, Casiano described what it was like to offer start to the daughter they named Halo. “She was gasping for air,” Casiano mentioned. “I simply saved telling myself and my child that I’m so sorry that this has occurred to you. I felt so unhealthy. She had no mercy. There was no mercy there for her.”

People within the courtroom wept as Casiano spoke.

The different girls with sophisticated pregnancies who testified have been Amanda Zurawski and Ashley Brandt. Brandt was in a position to journey out of Texas to obtain a selective discount for a twin whose cranium had not developed correctly. Zurawski’s water broke too early, however she was denied induction or abortion. She went into septic shock and was within the intensive care unit for 3 days.


Amanda Zurawski speaks throughout a press convention outdoors the Travis County Courthouse on July 19, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP through Getty Images


cover caption

toggle caption

SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP through Getty Images


Amanda Zurawski speaks throughout a press convention outdoors the Travis County Courthouse on July 19, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP through Getty Images

Attorney Amy Pletscher, representing Paxton’s workplace, objected regularly as the ladies described their experiences with being pregnant issues that have been left untreated in Texas. She argued that it was not related to debate previous medical historical past, however the decide allowed the testimony to proceed. Pletscher additionally requested every affected person witness if Attorney General Ken Paxton had personally denied them an abortion. Each mentioned no.

Molly Duane, the lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, attacked the defendant’s arguments, specified by a courtroom submitting in June, that not one of the affected person plaintiffs have standing. In the doc, the state argued that their previous hurt is the fault of the ladies’s docs and their future hurt — resembling injury to their reproductive well being — is hypothetical.

Duane countered: “Does the state assume that the one one that would have standing to problem an abortion regulation is a lady who involves courtroom with amniotic fluid or blood dripping down her leg?”

The last witness who testified Wednesday was Dr. Damla Karsan, one of many doctor plaintiffs within the lawsuit. She described the case of a affected person whose fetus had a deadly situation who needed to drive 14 hours to get an abortion out of state. “I really feel like my fingers are tied – I’ve the coaching, the ability, the expertise, even the amenities to supply the care, and I’m unable to supply that care and it is – it is intestine wrenching,” Karsan testified.

Lawyers for Texas have been particularly aggressive in cross-examining Karsan. Attorney Jonathan Stone repeatedly questioned whether or not she was accustomed to the exception language in Texas regulation previous to the present legal guidelines. He additionally questioned her about varied insurance policies of the hospitals the place she works. In its June submitting, the attorneys for Paxton’s workplace referred to Karsan as an “abortionist” fairly than a doctor or OB-GYN.

In a press convention after the listening to adjourned, plaintiff Amanda Zurawski mentioned she was shocked by the callousness of her cross-examination. “I survived sepsis and I do not assume at the moment was a lot much less traumatic than that,” she mentioned.

The listening to continues for a full day on Thursday. After it concludes, Judge Mangrum might rule on the momentary injunction and movement to dismiss at any time.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here