States filed lawsuits towards opioid producers and distributers. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to circulation to state governments. Advocates need to be certain it’s used to deal with the dependancy disaster.
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Images
cover caption
toggle caption
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Images
States filed lawsuits towards opioid producers and distributers. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to circulation to state governments. Advocates need to be certain it’s used to deal with the dependancy disaster.
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Images
Early in President Joe Biden’s tenure, his administration promised to play a key function in guaranteeing opioid settlement funds went towards tackling the nation’s dependancy disaster.
During the 2020 marketing campaign, Biden had laid out a plan to nominate an “opioid disaster accountability coordinator” to assist states of their lawsuits towards firms accused of sparking the overdose epidemic. The following yr, the White House convened a gathering concerning the soon-to-be finalized settlements, famous that the cash might assist drug coverage priorities, and helped create a mannequin regulation that states might undertake in anticipation of receiving funds.
But right now, as billions of {dollars} truly begin to circulation and state and native leaders make essential choices on easy methods to spend the greater than $50 billion windfall to sort out this entrenched public well being disaster, the federal authorities has gone largely quiet.
No federal worker holds the title of opioid disaster accountability coordinator. The Office of National Drug Control Policy has not launched public statements concerning the settlements in over a yr. And the settlement funds are talked about simply twice in a 150-page nationwide technique to scale back drug trafficking and overdose deaths.
‘Huge pots of cash’
The federal authorities just isn’t legally obligated to interact within the dialogue. After all, states filed the lawsuits towards firms that made, bought, or distributed opioid painkillers, together with Johnson & Johnson, McKesson, and Walmart.
But there may be an expectation that the federal authorities, together with the nation’s main companies on psychological well being and dependancy, ought to play a job. Public coverage and well being specialists say a vacuum of federal management might result in severe wasted alternatives and missteps in using the billions that can be paid out over practically twenty years — in what might be an unlucky reprise of the multibillion-dollar 1998 settlement with tobacco firms.
“States get large eyes after they get these big pots of cash,” says Bill Pierce, who served as spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services within the early 2000s. He was there when states started receiving money from the tobacco settlement. Soon sufficient, cash “begins to seep out to different areas that might be utterly unrelated,” he says.
Back then, tobacco firms agreed to pay states billions yearly for so long as they continued promoting cigarettes. But there have been no restrictions on the cash’s use and far of it went to plugging state funds gaps, filling potholes, and even subsidizing tobacco farmers. Today, lower than 3% of the annual payouts assist anti-smoking applications.
Protecting the opioid money
The opioid settlements have a built-in safety to handle this concern. At least 85% of the cash states obtain should be spent on opioid-related bills. But interpretations of qualifying bills differ extensively — typically primarily based on state politics. And oversight thus far has been weak. The firms paying out the cash are liable for holding states to that threshold, however they’re unlikely to observe intently, authorized specialists say.
Public vigilance might assist, however most states have promised little to no public reporting, making it tough to trace their use of funds. KFF Health News is following how state and native governments use — or misuse — the money via this yr.
Some individuals hope the federal authorities can fill this hole in oversight.
The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. It is a tribute to among the individuals who have died within the nation’s ongoing opioid epidemic.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
cover caption
toggle caption
Alex Wong/Getty Images
The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. It is a tribute to among the individuals who have died within the nation’s ongoing opioid epidemic.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
“There are alternatives to incentivize” and assist state and native governments “in the suitable route,” says Michele Gilbert, a senior coverage analyst with the suppose tank Bipartisan Policy Center. The Biden administration can situation official steerage, promote the findings of nationwide analysis, or leverage the facility of its purse strings. But thus far, “there hasn’t been quite a lot of federal authorities motion on the settlement.”
The Office of National Drug Control Policy advised KFF Health News it usually discusses using settlement {dollars} with governors, mayors, and different elected officers to make sure the cash bolsters federal efforts already underway. Beating the opioid epidemic by disrupting drug trafficking and increasing entry to therapy is among the 4 pillars of Biden’s “unity agenda.”
“We know that increasing entry to therapy for substance use dysfunction, lifesaving interventions like naloxone, and restoration assist providers will cut back the harms of dependancy and the overdose epidemic,” mentioned Rahul Gupta, director of nationwide drug management coverage.
That’s why the administration helped create a mannequin regulation, as “a blueprint for states and communities on evidence-based methods to make use of opioid settlement funds,” he mentioned. It’s been adopted, at the least partly, by 11 state legislatures and is being thought of by two others.
Lessons in lax oversight
But historical past suggests elective federal steerage will not be sufficient to make sure the cash is used for its supposed goal.
Matthew Myers, president of the nonprofit Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, mentioned it was a mistake for the federal authorities to take a again seat on the tobacco grasp settlement greater than twenty years in the past.
Those lawsuits aimed, partly, to get well well being care prices for smoking-related sicknesses. Medicaid, a public insurance coverage program for individuals with low incomes or disabilities, was a number one payer. Since Medicaid is collectively funded by the U.S. and state governments, federal authorities had a proper to among the settlement cash.
States lobbied Congress to forgo that declare. Myers and different advocates requested legislators to take action provided that they required states to spend at the least 25% of the funds on anti-smoking efforts.
But Congress waived its proper to the cash unconditionally.
“It was a big missed alternative,” Myers says, “as a result of it meant the federal authorities ended up having no say in anyway in how the {dollars} have been used.”
When it involves the opioid settlements, it is not clear if the federal authorities will attempt to declare reimbursement for Medicaid bills linked to opioid dependancy, which was estimated at $23 billion in 2019. Bruce Alexander, spokesperson for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, declined to reply particular questions and easily wrote, “CMS is at the moment reviewing the problem.”
The company has tried to recoup prices in at the least one case.
In 2019, CMS despatched a letter to Oklahoma asking for a part of the state’s $270 million settlement with Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin. According to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma lawyer basic’s workplace, the state finally reached an settlement to maintain all its Purdue settlement however later pay $390,000 to the federal company from a separate settlement with opioid producer Endo.
Some states, like Arkansas and Oregon, have deliberate for related potentialities of their public paperwork concerning the opioid settlements. But as of mid-March, neither state had obtained federal requests for his or her share.
A carrot-and-stick method
Health coverage specialists recommend the Biden administration might use the potential for claiming these funds as leverage: In return for permitting states to maintain the money, it might require all of it’s spent on addressing the opioid disaster or be used just for remedies backed by analysis.
Alternatively, it might connect situations to the greater than $6 billion in federal grants that goes to states every year to handle dependancy.
“The federal authorities is spending some huge cash on opioids,” says Pierce, the previous HHS spokesperson. “If they need, they might try to tie that cash to necessities that settlement cash be spent on opioids.”
In the Nineteen Seventies, the Nixon administration used an identical tactic, with federal transportation funding because the carrot. Given the power disaster on the time, the administration needed states to scale back oil consumption by imposing a most pace restrict of 55 mph. But it could not mandate states to take action. Instead, Nixon signed a regulation saying states might obtain federal freeway funding provided that they lowered pace limits. In the top, all states complied.
Myers, of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, put it this fashion: “States will solely hearken to the federal authorities if there is a monetary cause to take action.”
The federal authorities can also recommend the settlements be used to enhance, not duplicate, current federal funding, mentioned Gilbert, of the Bipartisan Policy Center.
For occasion, the cash might assist grassroots organizations that do not have the time or potential to use for federal grants, she mentioned. Or it might go to teams that present sterile syringes and different provides to individuals utilizing medication, which might’t be bought with taxpayer {dollars}.
The federal authorities can emphasize the extra versatile choices for spending the settlement cash in contrast with federal funds, Gilbert mentioned.
The Biden administration has been the primary to embrace grassroots applications and has known as for sustainable funding for “hurt discount providers” in its nationwide overdose prevention technique. But it has stopped in need of explicitly recommending settlement funds for this goal.
Such initiatives are designed to reduce the dangers of utilizing medication however are politically fraught, with critics saying they encourage criminal activity and supporters saying they save lives. Local opposition typically takes the type of “not-in-my-backyard” or questions on why sure neighborhoods bear the brunt of dependancy and homelessness issues.
In such turf disputes, the dearth of federal management is acutely felt, say some advocates.
For instance, in New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected a advice to make use of opioid settlement funds to assist two overdose prevention facilities — locations the place individuals can use illicit medication beneath supervision. She cited “varied state and federal legal guidelines” that make such websites unlawful. A related dialog is happening in San Francisco, with the mayor citing an absence of federal authorized readability on the problem.
Federal authorities have not acted to close down any websites thus far however have not publicly supported them both. The Office of National Drug Control Policy declined to remark, given ongoing litigation in a associated case in Philadelphia.
Some individuals query whether or not the Biden administration’s weighing in would have a lot affect, given the deep political divisions in some states the place native officers are desirous to flout federal steerage. Earlier this yr, Republican leaders in Tennessee rejected hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in federal funding for HIV prevention to push again on federal assist for transgender and abortion rights.
But Regina LaBelle, who was appearing director of nationwide drug management coverage throughout Biden’s early years and now works for Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute, says the federal authorities has managed to information state coverage on controversial matters earlier than.
In 2015, shortly after intravenous drug use sparked a significant HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a research exhibiting different counties have been equally susceptible. Kentucky, recognized as a sizzling spot, went on to implement insurance policies that dramatically elevated the variety of syringe service applications, that are identified to scale back HIV transmission.
Today, the Biden administration might present knowledge to equally inform native choices, LaBelle says. A nationwide dashboard launched late final yr to point out nonfatal overdoses is a begin. And there may be time to construct on that, for the reason that opioid settlements can be stretched out over a few years, she added.
“We have a chance to see what’s the suitable function of the federal authorities,” LaBelle says. “It’s not too late.”
KFF Health News, previously referred to as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is among the core working applications at KFF — the impartial supply for well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism.