This act would prohibit the manufacture, sale, and operation of robotic gadgets or drones which can be mounted with a weapon.
|
Listen to this text  |
Massachusetts State Rep. Linsay Sabadosa and State Sen. Michael Moore have filed “An Act to ensure the responsible use of advanced robotic technologies”. This act would prohibit the manufacture, sale, and operation of robotic gadgets or drones which can be mounted with a weapon.
This first-of-its-kind laws will implement rules goal at defending the general public whereas bringing stability and predictability to an rising market and its entrepreneurs. The invoice has three major provisions associated to robots, drones, and different uncrewed robotic gadgets in Massachusetts. These provisions:
- Ban the sale and use of weapons-mounted robotic gadgets
- Ban using robotic gadgets to threaten or harass
- Ban the utilization of robotic gadgets to bodily restrain a person
Those present in violation of those provisions will face fines between $5,000 and $25,000, along with another penalty imposed as a consequence of violations of current legal guidelines.
“Very often, the pace of innovation moves faster than critical regulation that protects the public. I’m pleased to have worked with Representative Sabadosa, the ACLU of Massachusetts, Boston Dynamics, and so many others to get ahead of what can be a very dangerous technology if in the wrong hands,” Senator Michael Moore mentioned. “This bill puts reasonable guardrails around the use of robots to harass members of the public and bans the weaponization of this technology by those without strict oversight, while also introducing rules for law enforcement to bolster public trust. I am hopeful that, if passed, this legislation can serve as a model for responsible robotics regulation in other states and beyond.”
The US Military and its contractors, legislation enforcement officers disposing of explosives, and personal corporations testing anti-weaponization applied sciences with case-by-case waivers from the Massachusetts Attorney General, are exempt from the penalties created by the invoice.
The invoice additionally codified necessities {that a} warrant is required when a robotic enters a personal property, besides in exigent circumstances. This measure is meant to guarantee public confidence in legislation enforcement officers’ use of those applied sciences. The invoice additionally requires that details about the utilization of superior robotic know-how by legislation enforcement businesses should be accessible to the general public below Massachusetts public data legislation.
“Advanced mobile robots are incredible tools that can enrich our lives and keep people safe, but makeshift efforts to weaponize general purpose robots threaten public trust and acceptance of this emerging technology,” Brendan Schulman, Vice President of Policy & Government Relations at Boston Dynamics, mentioned. “We recently led a consortium of six leading robotics companies calling on policymakers to ensure the ethical use of general-purpose robots and prohibit their misuse. We are proud to have worked in collaboration with Representative Sabadosa, Senator Moore, civil rights advocates, and robotics industry leaders, to help develop the nation’s first comprehensive legislation on this topic, in our home state of Massachusetts.”
Now that the invoice has been launched to the Massachusetts House and Senate the act can be assigned to legislative committees for analysis and testimony.
While this piece of laws is the primary of its variety within the nation, it probably received’t be the final. Conversations about whether or not or not weaponized robots must be used are ongoing. Last yr, the San Francisco supervisors reversed course and unanimously voted to briefly ban its police division from utilizing robots with deadly pressure. The subject was despatched again to the committee for additional dialogue and could possibly be voted on once more sooner or later.