According to mounting knowledge, one of many extra severe unwanted side effects of the COVID mRNA jabs seems to be dementia, and worse but, this beforehand untransmissible illness might now be “contagious,” transmissible by means of prions.
In my 2021 interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., she defined why she suspected the COVID pictures might finally end in an avalanche of neurological prion-based ailments equivalent to Alzheimer’s. She additionally revealed a paper detailing these mechanisms within the May 10, 2021, challenge of the International Journal of Vaccine Theory. As she defined in that paper:1
“A paper revealed by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein within the mRNA vaccines might trigger prion-like ailments, partially via its potential to bind to many identified proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions.
Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike protein’s S1 element is susceptible to act as a practical amyloid and kind poisonous aggregates … and might in the end result in neurodegeneration.”
In abstract, the take-home from Seneff’s paper is that the COVID pictures, provided to a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of individuals, are instruction units in your physique to make a poisonous protein that can finally wind up concentrated in your spleen, from the place prion-like protein directions will likely be despatched out, resulting in neurodegenerative ailments.
What Are Prions?
The time period “prion” derives from “proteinaceous infectious particle.” Prions are identified to trigger quite a lot of neurodegenerative ailments in animals and people, equivalent to Creutzfeldt-Jakob illness (CJD) in people, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow illness”) in cattle, and persistent losing illness in deer and elk.
These ailments are collectively known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). They’re characterised by lengthy incubation intervals, mind injury, the formation of holes within the mind giving it a sponge-like look, and failure to induce an inflammatory response.
In brief, prions are infectious brokers composed solely of a protein materials that may fold in a number of, structurally distinct methods, at the very least certainly one of which is transmissible to different prion proteins, resulting in a illness that’s much like viral infections however with out nucleic acids.
Unlike micro organism, viruses, and fungi, which include nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) that instruct their replication, prions propagate by transmitting their misfolded protein state to regular variants of the identical protein.
According to the prion illness mannequin, the infectious properties of prions are as a result of potential of the irregular protein to transform the traditional model of the protein into the misfolded kind, thereby setting off a sequence response that progressively damages the nervous system.
Prions are remarkably resistant to standard strategies of sterilization and might survive excessive circumstances that might usually destroy nucleic acids or different pathogens, which is a part of why prion ailments are so tough to deal with.
More Evidence mRNA Shots Can Trigger Dementia
Today, there’s much more proof to assist Seneff’s idea. In August 2022, tech entrepreneur Sid Belzberg wrote2 about prions.rip, an internet site he’d set as much as accumulate knowledge on the neurological unwanted side effects of the jabs. (This website is now not dwell.)
Within just a few months, the positioning had obtained about 15,000 hits and gathered 60 studies from individuals who obtained the jab and suffered neurological deficits shortly thereafter, together with six circumstances of identified CJD.
“Normally this disease affects 1 in a 1,000,000 people,” Belzberg wrote.3 “To get 6 circumstances you would wish 6,000,000 hits to the positioning assuming everybody studies. The probabilities of getting 1 case in 15,000 hits is 1 in 66. To see 6 circumstances in 1 group of 15,000 is 1/66^6 or 1 in 82,000,000,000, or 20 instances extra prone to win a Powerball lottery! …
To reiterate, CJD is an exceptionally uncommon illness that’s now a identified and established extreme opposed response (SAE) from the DEATHVAX™. Injecting this gradual kill bioweapon may cause illnesses which can be about as prone to develop in the true phrase as getting struck by lightning twice. The proof is now irrefutable.”
Frameshifting Can Result in Prion Production
In mid-December 2023, researchers reported4,5,6 that the changing of uracil with artificial methylpseudouridine within the COVID pictures — a course of referred to as codon optimization — may cause frameshifting, a glitch within the decoding, thereby triggering the manufacturing of off-target aberrant proteins.
The antibodies that develop because of this might, in flip, set off off-target immune reactions. According to the authors, off-target mobile immune responses happen in 25% to 30% of people that have obtained the COVID shot. But that’s not all.
According to British neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn, this frameshifting phenomenon has additionally been linked to dangerous prion manufacturing — and that body shifted prions, particularly, are infectious and will be transmitted from one particular person to a different. As reported within the Journal of Theoretical Biology in 2013:7
“A quantitatively constant clarification for the titres of infectivity present in quite a lot of prion-containing preparations is offered on the idea that the etiological brokers of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy comprise a really small inhabitants fraction of prion protein (PrP) variants, which include frameshifted components of their N-terminal octapeptide-repeat areas …
Frameshifting accounts quantitatively for the etiology of prion illness. One per million frameshifted prions could also be sufficient to trigger illness. The HIV TAR-like component within the PRNP mRNA is probably going an effector of frameshifting.”
McCairn defined this mechanism in a February 19, 2023, interview with Health Alliance Australia (video above). In it, he famous:
“Mis-folded proteins caused by prions can impact every level organ and tissue system in the body … [They] bioaccumulate and are resistant to degradation, thereby building up …”
Prions might in actual fact be the first molecule that’s being “shed” by COVID jab recipients, and if these prions are because of frameshifting, that may very well be very unhealthy information certainly, contemplating their implication in dementia.
Another physician who believes we’ll be dealing with an “epidemic of prion disease” is Dr. David Cartland. In late February 2024, he posted8 13 scientific papers linking the COVID jabs, prion ailments and CJD, noting that was only a “small selection” of what’s accessible within the medical literature.
Prions Implicated in Long COVID as Well
According to genomics skilled Kevin McKernan, Ph.D., prions are additionally concerned in lengthy COVID (or as McKernan calls it, “long vax”).9 In one 2024 research,10 96.7% of lengthy COVID victims had obtained the jab. In an interview with the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), McKernan said:11
“If you frameshift over the stop codons, you’re going to be making proteins that are spike-mito proteins. When I talk to a lot of the long vax patients I hear of all these things that remind me of my time in the mitochondrial disease sequencing space …”
McKernan claims he tried to publish a paper on this in 2021 with Dr. Peter McCullough, however the editor of the journal “stepped in and torpedoed the paper.”12
World’s Largest Side Effect Analysis Has Been Published
In associated information, the biggest research13 to this point on the unwanted side effects of the COVID jabs was revealed within the journal Vaccine in February 12, 2024, and it confirms what I and lots of different different information sources have been saying all alongside, specifically that the mRNA jabs are essentially the most harmful medical merchandise to ever hit the market.
The research — carried out by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project and funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Ontario and the Canadian Health Research Institute — evaluated the danger of “opposed occasions of particular curiosity” (AESI) following COVID-19 “vaccination.”
Data from 10 websites in eight international locations (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand and Scotland) had been included, encompassing greater than 99 million jabbed people.
Of the 1000’s of unwanted side effects Pfizer listed in its confidential report of post-authorization opposed occasions submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,14 the GCoVS centered on 13 AESIs that fall into three main classes: Neurological, hematologic (blood-related) and cardiovascular circumstances.
They calculated the AESI danger for every of the 13 AESIs based mostly on the variety of noticed versus anticipated (OE) incidents occurring as much as 42 days after injection. The “expected” variety of unwanted side effects had been based mostly on vaccine opposed occasion knowledge from 2015 to 2019. These charges had been then in comparison with the opposed occasion charges noticed in those that obtained a number of of the COVID jabs, both Pfizer’s BNT162b2, Moderna’s mRNA-1273, or AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1.
Largest Study to Date Confirms COVID Jab Dangers
The evaluation15 revealed a number of regarding unwanted side effects, together with elevated dangers of myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots within the mind, and varied neurological circumstances. Here’s a fast abstract of the findings:
• Myocarditis and pericarditis:
◦ Pfizer vaccine — OE ratios for myocarditis had been 2.78 and a couple of.86 after the primary and second pictures, with the danger remaining doubled after the third and fourth pictures.
◦ Moderna vaccine — OE ratios for myocarditis had been 3.48 and 6.10 after the primary and second pictures. Doses 1 and 4 additionally confirmed OE ratios of 1.74 and a couple of.64 for pericarditis.
◦ AstraZeneca vaccine — OE ratio for pericarditis was 6.91 after the third shot.
• Blood clots within the mind (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, CVST):
◦ An OE of three.23 for CVST was noticed after the primary AstraZeneca shot.
◦ A big improve in CVST danger was additionally famous after the second Pfizer dose.
• Neurological circumstances:
◦ Guillain-Barré syndrome — An OE ratio of two.49 was noticed following the AstraZeneca jab.
◦ Transverse myelitis — Risk almost doubled with the AstraZeneca shot.
◦ Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis — OE ratios of three.78 (Moderna) and a couple of.23 (AstraZeneca) had been famous.
These findings actually underscore the potential for severe unwanted side effects from the COVID pictures, together with circumstances which will result in different penalties in the long run, equivalent to stroke, coronary heart assault, paralysis and dying.
Effectiveness and Safety Was Wildly Exaggerated in Trials
Considering these findings, it’s no shock to seek out that effectiveness and security had been exaggerated in scientific trials and observational research. In a visitor submit on Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack, Raphael Lataster, Ph.D., writes:16
“An unofficial collection of 4 crucially necessary medical journal articles, two by me, showing in main tutorial writer Wiley’s Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice reveals that claims made about COVID-19 vaccines’ effectiveness and security had been exaggerated within the scientific trials and observational research, which considerably impacts risk-benefit analyses.
Also mentioned are the regarding matters of myocarditis, with proof indicating that this one opposed impact alone implies that the dangers outweigh the advantages within the younger and wholesome; and perceived unfavourable effectiveness, which signifies that the vaccines improve the possibility of COVID-19 an infection/hospitalization/dying, to say nothing about different opposed results.”
Summary of Papers
The 4 papers in query embrace:
1. “Sources of Bias in Observational Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness” revealed within the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice in March 2023, co-authored by BMJ editor Peter Doshi, Ph.D., statistician Kaiser Fung and biostatistician Mark Jones, which concluded that “case-counting window bias” had a major impact on effectiveness estimates.17
As defined by Lataster, this “issues the 7 days, 14 days, and even 21 days after the jab the place we are supposed to overlook jab-related points, equivalent to COVID infections, for some odd motive as ‘the vaccine has not had sufficient time to stimulate the immune system.’
This might strike you as fairly weird since the entire ‘fully vaccinated’ should undergo the method of being ‘partially vaccinated,’ typically much more than as soon as. To make issues worse, the unvaccinated don’t get such a ‘grace period,’ that means that there’s additionally a transparent bias at play.
In an instance utilizing knowledge from Pfizer’s scientific trial, the authors present that because of this bias, a vaccine with effectiveness of 0%, which is confirmed within the hypothetical scientific trial, may very well be seen in observational research as having effectiveness of 48%.”
2. “Reply to Fung et. al. on COVID-19 Vaccine Case-Counting Window Biases Overstating Vaccine Effectiveness,” authored by Lataster, which mentioned how the counting window bias not solely affected effectiveness estimates in observational research but in addition security estimates, suggesting a necessity for reassessment of vaccine security.18 The article additionally addresses “the mysterious rise in non-COVID excess deaths post-pandemic.”19
3. “How the Case Counting Window Affected Vaccine Efficacy Calculations in Randomized Trials of COVID-19 Vaccines,” once more co-authored by Doshi and Fung, which detailed how case-counting window points additionally overestimated effectiveness in Pfizer and Moderna scientific trials.20
4. A second article by Lataster, wherein he highlighted and summarized the proof displaying that scientific trials had been affected by opposed impact counting window points that led to exaggerated security estimates.21
“Together, these four articles make clear that claims made about COVID-19 vaccines; effectiveness and safety were exaggerated in the clinical trials and observational studies, whilst also finding time to discuss myocarditis and perceived negative effectiveness, meaning that new analyses are very much needed,” Lataster writes.22
Resources for Those Injured by the COVID Jab
Based on knowledge from internationally, it’s past clear that the COVID pictures are essentially the most harmful medicine ever deployed. If you already obtained a number of COVID jabs and are actually reconsidering, you’d be smart to keep away from all vaccines from right here on, as you want to finish the assault in your physique. Even should you haven’t skilled any apparent unwanted side effects, your well being should be impacted long-term, so don’t take any extra pictures.
If you’re affected by unwanted side effects, your first order of enterprise is to get rid of the spike protein — and/or any aberrant off-target protein — that your physique is producing. Two cures proven to bind to and facilitate the elimination of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I don’t know if these medicine will work on off-target proteins and nanolipid accumulation as nicely, nevertheless it in all probability wouldn’t harm to attempt.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a post-vaccine remedy protocol referred to as I-RECOVER. Since the protocol is repeatedly up to date as extra knowledge change into accessible, your finest wager is to obtain the newest model straight from the FLCCC web site at covid19criticalcare.com.23
For further recommendations, try the World Council for Health’s spike protein detox information,24 which focuses on pure substances like herbs, dietary supplements and teas. Sauna remedy may assist get rid of poisonous and misfolded proteins by stimulating autophagy.