The Download: Neuralink’s greatest rivals, and the case for phasing out the time period “consumer”

0
828
The Download: Neuralink’s greatest rivals, and the case for phasing out the time period “consumer”


In the world of brain-computer interfaces, it might appear as if one firm sucks up all of the oxygen within the room. Last month, Neuralink posted a video to X displaying the primary human topic to obtain its mind implant, which shall be named Telepathy. The recipient, a 29-year-old man who’s paralyzed from the shoulders down, performed pc chess, transferring the cursor round together with his thoughts.

Neuralink’s announcement of a first-in-human trial made a giant splash not due to what the person was capable of accomplish—scientists demonstrated utilizing a mind implant to maneuver a cursor in 2006—however as a result of the expertise is so superior.

But Neuralink isn’t the one firm creating brain-computer interfaces to assist individuals who have misplaced the power to maneuver or converse. Read on to check out among the corporations creating mind chips, their progress, and their completely different approaches to the expertise.

—Cassandra Willyard

This story is from The Checkup, our weekly well being and biotech e-newsletter. Sign up to obtain it in your inbox each Thursday.

It’s time to retire the time period “user”

People have been known as “users” for a very long time; it’s a sensible shorthand enforced by executives, founders, operators, engineers, and buyers advert infinitum.

Often, it’s the proper phrase to explain individuals who use software program: a consumer is greater than only a buyer or a shopper. Sometimes a consumer isn’t even an individual; company bots are identified to run accounts on Instagram and different social media platforms, for instance.

But “users” can also be unspecific sufficient to refer to only about everybody. It can accommodate nearly any large thought or long-term imaginative and prescient. We use—and are utilized by—computer systems and platforms and corporations. Though “user” appears to explain a relationship that’s deeply transactional, lots of the technological relationships through which an individual could be thought of a consumer are literally fairly private. That being the case, is “user” nonetheless related? Read the total story.

—Taylor Majewski

This story is from the subsequent journal difficulty of MIT Technology Review, set to go stay on April 24. If you don’t already, join now to get a replica when it lands.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here