However, the appellate court docket present in May that the “exclusion of damages caused by hostile or warlike action by a government or sovereign power in times of war or peace requires the involvement of military action.”
“The exclusion does not state the policy precluded coverage for damages arising out of a government action motivated by ill will,” it discovered.
The court docket’s stance has proved considerably controversial among the many insurance coverage and authorized communities.
The authentic resolution, on which the appellate court docket dominated final May, had been criticized by Kennedys companions Joshua Mooney and Julia Selby as wanting “backward to a century past”.