Cyberwar is at present going down on a number of ranges. On the worldwide stage, China and Russia particularly have turn into recognized for his or her hacking expertise. As reported by “Full Measure,”1 company cybercrime around the globe is now costing $940 billion every year, and that value is simply going up.
Russian hackers are inclined to concentrate on the monetary good points of ransomware, the assault on the Colonial Pipeline in 2021 being one notable instance.2 China, in the meantime, tends to pursue American commerce secrets and techniques. One instance given is the cyber theft of the engineering plans for the American F-35 fighter jet.
According to the “Full Measure” report (video above), the U.S. authorities estimates between $200 billion and $600 billion in commerce secrets and techniques and mental property has been stolen yearly for the final 20 years. The finish recreation of all this cyberwarfare is “to rule the world,” James Lewis, a cyber safety professional with the Center for International and Strategic Studies, instructed “Full Measure.”
China, he says, has been chosen to be the dominant energy on this planet, and “They believe China should be setting the rules internationally.” Lewis doesn’t specify who “they” are, however almost certainly he’s referring to the self-described “elites” that work for and/or with the World Economic Forum to result in The Great Reset.
They, certainly, have their sights on replicating the Chinese surveillance and management system worldwide, however whether or not they’ll truly permit the Chinese to rule their New World Order is up for debate.
Destroying Dissenters Through Cyberwarfare
So, typically talking, cyberattacks and hacking have turn into a main enterprise. There’s massive cash in it, whether or not we’re speaking concerning the theft of mental property or holding essential data hostage for ransom.
But cyberattacks usually are not only a monetary enterprise. Cyberwarfare can also be used to destroy dissenters, and most of these assaults are carried out on a nationwide stage — which means, governments are utilizing cyberwarfare methods on their very own residents.
When hackers destroyed my web site and electronic mail servers, they clearly had no intention of being profitable off of it. They wished to destroy our infrastructure, they usually had been profitable. Who would need to do this? The Russians? The Chinese? Probably not. No, the culprits are much more more likely to originate inside U.S. borders.
We now know that Big Tech has been pressured by the worldwide Great Reset cabal to censor individuals, around the globe, who reveal their agenda and converse out in opposition to their plans. In the U.S., Big Tech has additionally been illegally pressured to violate free-speech rights by a lot of U.S. authorities officers, together with President Biden personally.
The intent behind it’s the similar. The U.S. authorities is pursuing The Great Reset agenda and that features maintaining the COVID plandemic alive and getting as many as doable to undergo voluntary “vaccassination.” Facebook and Twitter each have particular portals3 that authorities officers use to censor content material. Whatever authorities disagrees with vanishes from the platforms, no questions requested.
Academics funded by the likes of Bill Gates have additionally printed globalist propaganda calling for cyberterrorism specialists to go on the counteroffensive to snuff out antivaxxers, the so-called “disinformation dozen” particularly. As it occurs, I’m on the prime of that checklist, and because it occurs, my web site was focused and destroyed by subtle hackers. Coincidence? I feel not.
It’s fairly clear that these behind this assault weren’t in it for the cash. They wished to silence me by placing me out of enterprise. Fortunately, they didn’t achieve that overarching aim. My articles are nonetheless being printed by means of Substack, and we had been in a position to get our on-line market again up which pays the payments for this text and employees in only some days.
But the message is evident. Censoring us will not be sufficient. They need to destroy us — and never simply me however all of us. The checklist of organizations which have had their web sites erased or destroyed by hackers is an extended one at this level, they usually all have one factor in frequent. They search to teach individuals about what’s actually happening, particularly the reality concerning the COVID pictures, that are neither secure nor efficient.
Equally lengthy, if not longer, is the checklist of people and organizations who’ve been debanked and had their on-line cost accounts shut down for the “crime” of sharing data that doesn’t match the globalist narrative. All of those techniques are techniques utilized in trendy conflict, and now they’re getting used in opposition to us.
Public Call for Cyberterrorism Against US Citizens
One of probably the most aggressive promoters of unlawful cyberwarfare in opposition to U.S. residents is Gates-funded pediatrician Dr. Peter Hotez,4 dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
He’s additionally the co-director of the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine Development and, mockingly, a well being coverage scholar within the Baylor Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, regardless of having no intention of making use of medical ethics in any way.
Twice the previously prestigious science journal Nature has printed articles by Hotez by which he requires the usage of cyberwarfare assaults on American residents who disagree with official COVID narratives.
The first got here out in April 2021.5 In that article, Hotez argued that stopping the unfold of COVID “will require a high-level counteroffensive” in opposition to “destructive forces,” which means these sharing details about the risks and absolute uselessness of the COVID pictures.
Of course, propaganda wouldn’t be propaganda with out sure key slurs, so individuals involved about vaccine security are described as “far-right extremists” and “conspiracy theorists” fueled by Russian misinformation.
“Accurate, targeted counter-messaging from the global health community is important but insufficient, as is public pressure on social-media companies. The United Nations and the highest levels of governments must take direct, even confrontational, approaches with Russia, and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States,” Hotez wrote.6
“Efforts should develop into the realm of cyber safety, legislation enforcement, public schooling and worldwide relations. A high-level inter-agency activity drive reporting to the UN secretary-general may assess the total influence of anti-vaccine aggression, and suggest powerful, balanced measures.
The activity drive ought to embrace specialists who’ve tackled complicated world threats equivalent to terrorism, cyber assaults and nuclear armament, as a result of anti-science is now approaching comparable ranges of peril. It is turning into more and more clear that advancing immunization requires a counteroffensive.”
Nature Publishes Second Hotez Threat
Today, greater than a yr later, lots of Hotez’ arguments for the COVID jab are moot. Pfizer itself has even admitted they by no means examined the shot to see if it truly prevented an infection and unfold. We even have clear information exhibiting it doesn’t, in truth, forestall unfold, and subsequently can not finish the pandemic irrespective of how many individuals get the jab or what number of doses they take.
Hotez, nevertheless, is doubling down. In a November 2, 2022, Nature article,7 he argues that “SARS-CoV-2 variants offer a second chance to fix vaccine inequities” and “combat rising anti-vaccine aggression.” Ironically, Hotez was out of step with actuality whilst his article was being printed.
“The failures to both fully vaccinate and boost could create a dire situation in 2023 as the Omicron subvariants continue mutating … with unprecedented growth and immune escape advantages,” Hotez wrote, paying no consideration to the truth that even individuals with 5 doses are nonetheless getting sick with COVID.
Gauging by the case of Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the fifth dose could supply solely 4 weeks of safety. Clearly, extra doses usually are not the reply. If 5 doses can’t defend you for greater than a month, why proceed?
Hotez doesn’t tackle any of those realities, nevertheless, and as an alternative doubles down on aggressively eliminating those that contribute to the rising “vaccine hesitancy.”
“The anti-vaccine movement has evolved into a deliberate, organized and well-financed destructive force,” he writes in his newest article. “It kills extra individuals than world terrorism, nuclear proliferation and cyberattacks mixed. Yet, we don’t deal with it as such …
Promoting native vaccine manufacturing of the Omicron boosters whereas countering the anti-vaccine activism … characterize the brand new twin pillars of world vaccine fairness. Urgent motion to handle each forces will assist to right the previous errors …”
Part of the “countering anti-vaccine activism” that Hotez is repeatedly calling for is cyberterrorist assaults on web sites equivalent to Mercola.com. So, who, precisely, is the terrorist right here? The one handing out free data to whomever needs it, or the one calling for armed aggression and cyberattacks in opposition to civilians exercising their free speech rights?
Hotez Implicated in COVID Engineering
Earlier this fall we found Hotez may very well have extra private causes for asking authorities goons to assault those that punch holes within the cabal’s narrative.
Not solely is he an irrational defender of the already-proven ineffective and harmful COVID pictures, he’s additionally tried to dismiss the lab leak idea as “an outlandish conspiracy theory,” and referred to as for an finish to the Congressional probe into gain-of-function analysis, decrying it as a “threat to American biomedical science.”8
Hotez’s dismissal of the lab escape idea is especially ironic contemplating he acquired a $6.1 million grant9 from the National Institutes of Health in 2012 for the event of a SARS vaccine in case of an “accidental release from a laboratory,” “deliberate spreading of the virus by a terrorist attack,” or a zoonotic spillover occasion.
The analysis beneath that grant happened from 2012 till 2017. After spending 5 years making ready for the opportunity of an unintentional or deliberate launch of SARS, why would Hotez suppose a lab leak of SARS-CoV-2 was out of the query? Clearly, Hotez isn’t any stranger to the opportunity of lab leaks.
Well, in early August 2022, U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) found a possible motive for why Hotez was so adamant about COVID being all-natural and why he’s so against Congress wanting into potential improprieties involving gain-of-function analysis.10
As it seems, Hotez funded gain-of-function analysis11 to create a chimeric SARS-related coronavirus — the very analysis now being scrutinized by Congress, partially as a result of it might assist clarify the place SARS-CoV-2 got here from, and partially as a result of it seems this analysis ought to have been topic to gain-of-function overview procedures however wasn’t.
So, may or not it’s that Hotez’s dismissals of the lab leak idea and the Congressional inquiry are primarily based in concern that he could also be implicated within the creation of the COVID pandemic?
At naked minimal, he’s bought conflicts of curiosity that may coloration his opinions on these issues. His conflicts of curiosity are all of the extra pertinent when you think about he’s on The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, the place he co-chairs the COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics activity drive.12
An Open War on the Public
We’re now in a scenario the place asking legitimate questions on public well being measures are equated to acts of home terrorism. It’s unbelievable, but right here we’re.
Over the previous three years, the rhetoric used in opposition to those that query the sanity of utilizing unscientific pandemic countermeasures, equivalent to face masks and lockdowns, or share information exhibiting that COVID-19 gene therapies are actually unhealthy public well being coverage.
It has turn into more and more violent, and in basic Orwellian Doublespeak, those that declare to defend science and democracy are literally undermining each, and blatantly so. Similarly, those that declare to fight hate speech and terrorism truly foster and create it.
However, in the long run, lies can not stand as much as the reality, which is exactly why deep state organizations such because the International Grand Committee on Disinformation13 (IGCD) and the Centers for Countering Digital Hate14 (CCDH) are working additional time to harmonize legal guidelines throughout the democratic world to censor and get rid of all counternarratives — and to make use of extra aggressive warfare techniques when that doesn’t work.
Currently, it’s primarily about silencing questions and inconvenient truths about all issues regarding COVID, however sooner or later, such legal guidelines will permit them to silence dialogue on any subject that threatens undemocratic rule by globalists.
Protecting Free Speech Is Paramount
Make no mistake, the globalist cabal intends to regulate everybody on the planet, and people they can’t management, they may search to both destroy or kill. It’s open conflict on the general public, and with out freedom of speech, we lose one in every of our simplest technique of protection.
To keep away from such a destiny, we should be relentless in our pursuit of sharing fact, and we should demand that our elected representatives rise up for freedom of speech and different Constitutional rights.
We additionally have to repeal the modification to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that legalized the U.S. authorities’s use of propaganda in opposition to its personal residents.15 The use of state propaganda in opposition to the American public was unlawful till 2012, when then-president Obama amended the NDAA to legalize it.
I consider it is a main motive why no shred of fact comes out of the mainstream media anymore. They’re all following a prescribed propaganda narrative, and no quantity of proof on the contrary influences them.