In an October 4, 2022, Fox Information interview, civil rights lawyer Aaron Siri, authorized counsel for the Knowledgeable Consent Motion Community (ICAN), shared surprising V-Secure information obtained from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention after a number of authorized calls for.
For greater than 15 months, the CDC fought to not launch any of those information. ICAN needed to file two lawsuits and a number of appeals to get the CDC at hand it over, and once you see the information, you perceive why.
What Is V-Secure?
By now, many know in regards to the existence of the Vaccine Antagonistic Occasions Reporting System (VAERS), a publicly out there database for vaccine adversarial occasion experiences, collectively managed by the CDC and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration.
V-Secure1 is one other database managed and monitored by the CDC. It is a voluntary “after vaccination well being checker” deployed to gather information on those that received the COVID jab.
Anybody in america can enroll in V-Secure, utilizing their smartphone, after receiving any dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Dad and mom also can enroll their underage kids to maintain tabs on well being results. In the course of the first week after every dose, V-Secure will ship you a day by day textual content message asking for particulars in your well being and well-being. After that, check-ins are despatched out on an intermittent foundation.
What Does V-Secure Present?
So, what does the V-Secure information, which the CDC was so reluctant to launch, really present? Are the COVID jabs as innocent as they’re claimed to be? Removed from it.
As detailed by Siri, out of the ten million folks enrolled in V-Secure, 7.7% (770,000 folks) required medical care after getting the shot and 25% (2.5 million folks) missed work or faculty or suffered a severe aspect impact that affected their day-to-day life.
As famous by Siri, these numbers are extraordinary. One of many key messages we got was that whereas COVID was not a big menace to all folks, getting the shot would restrict the variety of hospitalizations, deaths and days missed from work as a consequence of an infection.
Nicely, we now see that 25% of those that received the shot ended up lacking work or faculty due to the unwanted side effects, and seven.7% wanted medical care. That is staggering, and fully nullifies the CDC’s argument that everybody ought to get the shot, whether or not they’re in a high-risk class or not, and whether or not they’ve already had COVID-19 or not.
Large Immune Response Sign
The V-Secure information additionally present an enormous sign with regard to the jab inflicting an adversarial immune response. 4 million folks, out of the ten million — 40% — reported joint ache. Two million, or 20%, reported “reasonable” joint ache and 400,000, or 4%, labeled the ache as “extreme.”
As famous by Siri, joint ache is usually an indication of an immune response and may very well be trigger for concern when it happens after vaccination, particularly when you think about that the pictures have been supposed to guard the aged, who already are inclined to have joint issues.
The V-Secure database additionally reveals that despite the fact that fewer doses of Moderna have been registered, it is mRNA shot accounts for a bigger portion of unfavourable results, in comparison with Pfizer’s jab.
ICAN has now constructed a searchable dashboard of this V-Secure information.2 Within the video beneath, Albert Benavides (who goes by the title Welcome the Eagle 88), an RCM professional, information analyst and auditor, offers a tour and overview of find out how to use the dashboard, together with a few of its strengths and weaknesses.
Why Did the CDC Combat to Preserve V-Secure Knowledge Hidden?
In an October 5, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch commented on the V-Secure information dump:3
“V-Secure is a voluntary security monitoring program put in place by the CDC to watch adversarial reactions after folks take a vaccine. The V-Secure information exhibits that 33.1% of the individuals who received the vaccine suffered from a big adversarial occasion and seven.7% needed to search skilled medical care.
These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly present the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC intentionally hid this info from the American public, and that the drug firms falsified the information within the trials … the CDC will not be defending the American folks. They’re defending the producers of the vaccines.”
As famous by Kirsch, unwanted side effects may very well be both under- or overestimated in V-Secure, or each, as some would possibly ignore V-Secure requests to reply questions, and others might solely join or be incentivized to fill out the questionnaire in the event that they endure an issue.
Moreover, the choices for reporting a aspect impact are predefined and really generic, so folks may be experiencing results that did not match any of the predefined classes of damage. Importantly, loss of life will not be reportable to V-Secure, as useless folks can not use their telephones. So, now we have no manner of understanding what number of of those 10 million registered V-Secure customers have died.
Nonetheless, “Whether or not the charges in V-Secure is over-reported or under-reported is a crimson herring,” Kirsch says. “The difficulty that ought to concern everyone seems to be the CDC hid all of the V-Secure information from everybody the whole time.”
Along with spending taxpayer {dollars} to stop the discharge of this info — which now we have each proper to — the CDC additionally stopped selling use of V-Secure round Could 2021, mere months into the COVID jab rollout. As famous by Kirsch, this was in all probability as a result of “it grew to become crystal clear that it was accumulating information that confirmed the vaccines have been unsafe.”
CDC Ignored Clear ‘Demise’ Sign
In an October 3, 2022, article,4 Kirsch additionally factors out that the system the CDC makes use of to set off security indicators — described in its VAERS normal working procedures guide5 — is “critically flawed.” May that be intentional as nicely?
In July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part collection6,7,8 on how the CDC was hiding security indicators. In August 2021, Kirsch additionally knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was, in fact, ignored. Nonetheless, “even utilizing their very own flawed system, ‘loss of life’ ought to have triggered a sign,” he writes. But the CDC didn’t notify the general public of what they’d discovered. Here is an excerpt from Kirsch article:9
“If you would like goal proof of complete ineptitude by the CDC and the medical group in monitoring the protection of the COVID vaccines, that is the article you’ve got been ready for. We use their numbers and their very own algorithm and present that it ought to have triggered a security sign for ‘loss of life.’
There is no such thing as a manner they will argue their manner out of this one … We’d like look no additional than the vaccine security sign monitoring system10 utilized by the CDC to show our level …
The system the CDC makes use of for producing security indicators is basically flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with plenty of adversarial occasions will ‘masks’ massive numbers of essential security indicators … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell:
PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc11 as follows …
A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of no less than 2, chi-squared statistic of no less than 4, and 3 or extra circumstances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the precise vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:
Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look protected would use the phrase ‘and‘ within the definition of a security sign. Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not glad, no security sign will probably be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will not often set off which nearly ensures that almost all occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.
The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will not often exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of adversarial occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the system is a large quantity) so the numerator is all the time close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ isn’t triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”
A Fictitious Instance
Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch goes on to elucidate how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly below the radar and never get flagged, because of the CDC’s flawed system:12
“Suppose now we have the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes adversarial occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 totally different adversarial occasions, and every adversarial occasion has 1,000 situations.
That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let us take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adversarial occasions complete.
Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we aren’t even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 folks in a 12 months … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘protected’ utilizing the PRR system.”
Calculating Demise Sign for COVID Jab
Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR (proportional reporting ratio) for loss of life for the COVID jab, utilizing VAERS information and the CDC’s definitions and system.
As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adversarial occasions complete for all vaccines aside from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adversarial occasions complete for the COVID jabs. Here is the system as defined by Kirsch:13
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the adversarial occasions generated by the vaccine, the loss of life sign didn’t get drowned out!
However there’s nonetheless the chi-square check. Chi-square check outcomes have been 18,549 for ‘loss of life,’ which tremendously exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square check is clearly glad for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the loss of life sign is so enormous, it even survived the PRR check.
Which means even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … system, all three standards have been glad:
1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3. 3 or extra experiences: There have been over 31,214 loss of life experiences acquired by VAERS … which is greater than 3
A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … Does anybody care? A whole lot of 1000’s of American lives have been misplaced because of the lack of ability of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation …
It has been identified since no less than 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.14 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”
CDC Can’t Declare It Did not Know
The CDC is accountable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Secure, and between these two databases, there is not any potential manner they might ever say they did not know the pictures have been harming and killing thousands and thousands of Individuals.
The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered15) confirmed huge will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers circumstances.16
The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to folks of all ages, together with infants and pregnant girls.
If the CDC was the truth is monitoring these databases, as required, there’s merely no manner they might have continued to authorize these pictures primarily based on the information. Is that why these information have been by no means reviewed? In all probability. ACIP and VRBPAC members, for no matter purpose, merely did not wish to know the reality. However the CDC has identified all alongside, and there is not any excuse for not sharing and performing on that information.
Assist Unfold the Phrase
The media are ignoring all of this — the V-Secure information and the CDC’s failure to behave on a transparent security sign (and the sign being loss of life, of all issues!), even when utilizing a system that was flawed from the beginning. So, unfold the phrase. Everybody must know these info. It is not hypothesis, it is the CDC’s personal information.
The CDC wants to elucidate why they spent our tax {dollars} to battle the discharge of the V-Secure information for 15 months, and why they did not halt the pictures when a “loss of life” sign was evident. The mainstream press, members of Congress, the medical group and Universities additionally want to elucidate why they refuse to analyze these CDC information. To that finish, listed here are a couple of strategies for how one can assist:
|
Assist Sen. Ron Johnson, at the moment the one senator keen to analyze the reality of the COVID jabs. |
|
Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to analyze the CDC’s security monitoring. As famous by Kirsch, “You merely can not have a security company not be capable of monitor security.” |
|
Contact your native newspaper and urge them to analyze and report on the V-Secure information, the VAERS information and the CDC’s failure to behave when a security sign was detected. |
|
Share the information on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical group is investigating these issues. |
|
Share this info along with your physician and members of the medical group. |
|
Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to elucidate how and why, in mild of those info, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID pictures for his or her college students. |