CDC Aware of Hundreds of Safety Signals for COVID Jab

In September 2022, The Epoch Times requested the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to launch its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) knowledge mining outcomes. PRR¹ measures how widespread an adversarial occasion is for a particular drug in comparison with all the opposite medication within the database.

According to the usual working procedures^2,3 for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is run collectively by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to carry out these knowledge mining analyses.

Not solely did the CDC refuse to launch the info, but it surely additionally supplied false info — twice — in response to The Epoch Times’ questions in regards to the monitoring being carried out. As reported by The Epoch Times again in September 2022,⁴ the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses have been “exterior the company’s purview” and that no monitoring was being performed by them.

Eventually, the company admitted it was doing PRRs, beginning in February 2021, solely to later declare they did not carry out any PRRs till March 2022. The Epoch Times additionally cited a number of papers during which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their knowledge mining efforts had come up empty handed.⁵ Now, we discover that was all a pack of lies.

CDC Monitoring Reveals Hundreds of Safety Signals

In actuality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of security indicators, together with Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and loss of life — all of which, in keeping with the foundations, require thorough investigation to both verify or rule out a attainable hyperlink to the photographs. As reported by The Epoch Times in early January 2023:⁶

“The CDC evaluation was carried out on adversarial occasions reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Times obtained the outcomes via a Freedom of Information Act request after the CDC refused to make the outcomes public …

PRR includes evaluating the incidence of a particular adversarial occasion after a particular vaccine to the incidence in spite of everything different vaccines. A sign is triggered when three thresholds are met, in keeping with the CDC: a PRR of no less than 2, a chi-squared statistic of no less than 4, and three or extra circumstances of the occasion following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared assessments are a type of statistical evaluation used to look at knowledge.

The outcomes obtained by The Epoch Times present that there are a whole lot of adversarial occasions (AEs) that meet the definition, together with critical situations resembling blood clotting within the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a scarcity of oxygen to the guts, and even loss of life. The excessive numbers, notably the chi-squared figures, involved specialists.

For most of the occasions, ‘the chi-squared is so excessive that, from a Bayesian perspective, the chance that the true charge of the AE of the COVID vaccines shouldn’t be larger than that of the non-COVID vaccines is basically zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of threat administration at Queen Mary University of London, instructed The Epoch Times in an e-mail after operating the numbers via a Bayesian mannequin that gives possibilities based mostly on accessible info.”

Myopericarditis Is Far From the Only Problem

One of the few unwanted effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has truly acknowledged is myocarditis (coronary heart irritation), and a associated situation referred to as pericarditis (irritation of the guts sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring outcomes reveal there are greater than 500 different adversarial occasions which have stronger warning indicators than both of these situations.

Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor skilled in statistics at Princeton University instructed The Epoch Times:⁷

“We know that the sign for myocarditis is related to one thing that’s brought on by the mRNA vaccines, so it is greater than cheap to say that something with a sign bigger than myocarditis/pericarditis must be taken significantly and investigated.”

Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.⁸ Below is a abstract listing of among the key findings from the CDC’s PRR evaluation. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for extra particulars, I counsel studying it in its entirety.

For much more analyses and commentary, see Fenton’s Substack article, “The CDC’s Data on COVID Vaccine Safety Signals.”⁹ If you need to examine the PRR knowledge for your self, you’ll be able to obtain them from The Epoch Times’ January 3, 2023, article.¹⁰ You also can discover them right here.¹¹

It’s price noting that the CDC did not carry out its first security sign evaluation till March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the photographs have been rolled out. Why the lengthy wait — particularly because the CDC had introduced it could start monitoring in early 2021? Just contemplate, for a second, what number of lives have been misplaced as a result of the CDC did not correctly monitor security, and nonetheless drags its ft in terms of warning folks in regards to the dangers concerned.

FDA Still Refuses to Share Safety Data

The FDA can be required to carry out security monitoring utilizing one other method referred to as Empirical Bayesian knowledge mining. The Epoch Times first requested the FDA to launch its monitoring outcomes again in July 2022,^13,14 however just like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the info confirmed no proof of great adversarial results. In different phrases, “Just belief us. We’re specialists.”

According to the FDA, the one potential sign they’d discovered via April 16, 2021, was for raised physique temperature.¹⁵ Then, in mid-December 2022 — simply 4 months after The Epoch Times tried to get these knowledge — the FDA introduced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood circulate within the lungs) had met the brink for a statistical sign, and continued to satisfy the standards after in-depth analysis, but it surely was solely linked to the Pfizer jab.¹⁶

As famous by The Epoch Times,¹⁷ pulmonary embolism can be recognized as a sign within the CDC’s PRR evaluation for people as younger as 12, which actually should strengthen considerations.

The FDA additionally admitted it had already evaluated three different warning indicators: lack of oxygen to the guts, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet dysfunction) and intravascular coagulation (a kind of blood clotting), however none of those continued to satisfy the brink after evaluation.

If the FDA was evaluating 4 warning indicators, why did they inform The Epoch Times there was no proof of sick results, and why did they declare the one potential sign they’d discovered was slight fever? Are we to imagine they found these indicators after The Epoch Times requested for the monitoring outcomes after which accomplished 4 in-depth investigations in 4 months?

Whatever the reality, it is clear that each the CDC and FDA aren’t being clear. Worse, they’ve hidden knowledge, understanding it may imply the distinction between life and loss of life for a whole lot of hundreds of individuals.

CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Death’ Signal

The CDC ignoring a transparent sign for loss of life might be probably the most egregious instance of its failures as a public well being establishment. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part sequence^18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding security indicators through the use of a flawed system. In August that 12 months, Steve Kirsch knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was ignored.

Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,²¹ Kirsch went on to point out how “loss of life” ought to have triggered a sign even when utilizing the CDC’s flawed system (which is described in its VAERS normal working procedures guide²²). Here’s an excerpt:²³

“The system the CDC makes use of for producing security indicators is basically flawed; a ‘unhealthy’ vaccine with a lot of adversarial occasions will ‘masks’ massive numbers of essential security indicators … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc²⁴ as follows …

A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of no less than 2, chi-squared statistic of no less than 4, and three or extra circumstances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the particular vaccine of curiosity. This is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Here it’s from the doc:

Only somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look protected would use the phrase ‘and’ within the definition of a security sign.

Using ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not happy, no security sign will likely be generated. As famous under, the PRR will hardly ever set off which nearly ensures that the majority occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.

The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will hardly ever exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of adversarial occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the system is a big quantity) so the numerator is all the time close to zero. Hence, the ‘security sign’ is never triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”

A Fictitious Example

Using a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch defined how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly beneath the radar and never get flagged, due to this flawed system:²⁵

“Suppose we now have the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes adversarial occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 completely different adversarial occasions, and every adversarial occasion has 1,000 cases.

That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let’s take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adversarial occasions complete.

Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we aren’t even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 folks in a 12 months … The level is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘protected’ utilizing the PRR system.”

Calculating Death Signal for the COVID Jab

Next, Kirsch calculates the PRR for loss of life for the COVID jab — utilizing VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s definitions and system. As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adversarial occasions complete for all vaccines apart from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adversarial occasions complete for the COVID jabs. Here’s the system as defined by Kirsch:²⁶

“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the adversarial occasions generated by the vaccine, the loss of life sign didn’t get drowned out!

But there’s nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes have been 18,549 for ‘loss of life,’ which tremendously exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly happy for the COVID vaccine. Because the loss of life sign is so enormous, it even survived the PRR take a look at.

This implies that even utilizing the CDCs personal faulty … system, all three standards have been happy:

A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … Hundreds of hundreds of American lives have been misplaced as a result of incapacity of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation … It’s been recognized since no less than 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.²⁷ I do not know why the CDC does not use it.”

The CDC can be hiding the severity of unwanted effects in different methods. As defined by Fenton,²⁸ the way in which unwanted effects are categorized by the CDC assist obfuscate the dimensions of sure issues. For instance, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial pressure” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate classes, though in actual life they’re all potential results of myocarditis.

By separating them, you find yourself with fewer frequency counts per class, thereby supplying you with an underpowered chi-square take a look at so {that a} warning sign shouldn’t be triggered. If associated classes have been merged, far stronger security indicators would possible emerge.

CDC Has No Reasonable Defense

The CDC is accountable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Safe, and between these two databases, there is no attainable method they might ever say they did not know the photographs have been harming and killing tens of millions of Americans.

The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered²⁹) confirmed huge will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers circumstances.³⁰

The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to folks of all ages, together with infants and pregnant ladies.

They even added these poisonous photographs to the childhood vaccine schedule — which permits states to mandate them for college attendance — with out addressing any of the 66 security indicators discovered within the CDC’s PRR evaluation. The truth of the matter is that the CDC has recognized about these dangers all alongside, and there is no excuse for not sharing and appearing on these knowledge.

Help Spread the Word

Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so assist unfold the phrase. Everyone must know what the CDC’s security knowledge reveal. To that finish, listed here are a couple of options for how one can assist:

• Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to research the CDC’s security monitoring — We can’t have a public security company that’s incapable of monitoring security and taking applicable motion when issues are discovered, be it correcting a flawed system or saying {that a} security sign has been detected. Of course, they have to additionally publish their findings as soon as an investigation has been made.
• Contact your native newspaper and urge them to research and report on the CDC’s failure to behave on security indicators.
• Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical group is investigating these issues.
• Share this info together with your physician and members of the medical group.
• Also share it with college directors, and ask them to elucidate how and why, in gentle of those knowledge, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs.