The insurance coverage claims business is in a relentless battle to forestall policyholders and the general public from figuring out all of the unhealthy religion actions insurers do to delay, deny, and underpay claims. Like any unhealthy actor, secrecy of the wrongful motion is a core element to forestall accountability. We famous this motive for secrecy in Trade Secrets: Dynamite Discovery Decisions, Part 11.
In his wonderful weblog, claims professional Dennis Wall has been writing about wrongful claims practices secrecy. He famous a latest case1 the place Oklahoma policyholders efficiently obtained standing to problem the secrecy of key paperwork and proof of unhealthy religion conduct in Trial Court Do Over For Sealed Documents In Insurance Bad Faith Case. He famous the significance of the case:
This ruling that nonparties to an insurance coverage unhealthy religion lawsuit have standing to say public entry to supplies concerned in that lawsuit is probably vital to different insurance coverage unhealthy religion lawsuits in different jurisdictions during which trial courts have entered protecting orders barring disclosure of such supplies in comparable instances.
…
Like the Newbys, nonparties to unhealthy religion litigation in different jurisdictions might win the battle however lose the conflict of public entry, so to talk — however the potential exists for public entry to paperwork filed in public court docket information in each case, and so it existed right here. Most importantly for different litigation, nonparties have standing to sue to require public entry in insurance coverage unhealthy religion litigation if this choice is adopted elsewhere in that regard.
The circumstances surrounding these acts led to a $25m settlement with the State of Oklahoma, as famous in Hot off the Press: Farmers to Pay Oklahoma Policyholders $25 Million for Earthquake Claims. Discovery in an insurance coverage unhealthy religion case is commonly a sport “hide the evidence” by the insurance coverage firm attempting to forestall turning over the incriminating proof. If it had been a legal case moderately than a civil matter, it might be known as “obstruction of justice.”
Thought For The Day
The best evils on this planet is not going to be carried out by males with weapons, however by males in fits sitting behind desks.
—Hannah Arendt
1 Good v. Farmers Ins. Co., 536 P.3d 961, 2023 WL 5951464 (Okla. Civ. App. Feb. 15, 2023).