All Eyes Are on the WHO as They attempt to Take Over the World

All Eyes on the WHO

The World Health Organization circa 2023 is a villain. They are an excuse for cash laundering and subjugating harmless folks for the profit and the comfort of the most important oligarchs.

They glorify themselves — however phrases are low cost, and we could also be hurting — however we’re not lobotomized. We haven’t forgotten what their “guidance” has performed to us prior to now three years. We are sicker, we have now much less freedom, much less dignity, and anyone is continually making an attempt to stay a needle or ten into our arms. What delight.

On my finish, I nonetheless keep in mind how solely three years in the past, the rumor about this video by the WHO was whispered and handed round as an not possible, unthinkable conspiracy concept. Oh, how time flies.

Here is a superb introduction to the subject by Dr. Meryl Nass from May 2023 that she delivered on the International Covid Summit III:

Four Treacherous Tracks

Right now, the efforts by the WHO to rip-off the folks of the world and to make our lives worse are taking place on 4 totally different tracks, as documented by James Roguski and Dr. Meryl Nass on their respective Substacks (right here and right here) and on the brand new devoted web site, Door to Freedom. Here are the 4 tracks which can be necessary to concentrate to proper now, per James Roguski:

• The Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response
• The Amendments to the International Health Regulations adopted in May 2022 that must be rejected by the tip of November of this yr
• The new set of Amendments to the International Health Regulations which can be at the moment being labored on, anticipated to be formally submitted for consideration as a draft in January 2024 and adopted in May 2024
• The WHO CA+ Framework Convention (previously referred to as “Pandemic Treaty”)

James factors out 4 shortly approaching deadlines:

• September 20, 2023 — The United Nations plans to undertake a “Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response.”
• December 1, 2023 — Deadline to REJECT the amendments to the International Health Regulations that had been adopted on May 27, 2022.
• Mid-January, 2024 — Deadline for enter to the 300+ amendments to the International Health Regulations which can be at the moment being negotiated in secret.
• May 2024 — Scheduled date for adoption of the 300+ amendments and the WHO CA+ Framework Convention (AKA: “Pandemic Treaty”).

Exit the WHO

One option to clear up all of the WHO woes is to exit the WHO.

This invoice has 51 cosponsors. Ask your Congress member to signal on to keep up US sovereignty. @door_tofreedom https://t.co/VKnkPREFIz

— MERYL NASS, MD (@NassMeryl) August 26, 2023

James supplies a very detailed details about what you are able to do. Sounds like a great plan!

>>>>> Clich Here <<<<<

Now let’s return to the 4 particular person tracks that the WHO is pursuing in an effort to give a veneer of respectability to the traditional enrichment scheme wrapped in a story about “our health.”

United Nations “Political Declaration”

The “Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response”¹ is a non-binding United Nations declaration scheduled to be adopted in September 2023. While it’s non-binding, it adopted, it’s going to give steam to adjoining nefarious agendas and supply a further means of supporting the efforts taking place on different tracks.

The declaration, uhm, declares a urgent want for 30 billion {dollars} to be spent on “health.” “Health” is an Orwellian euphemism referring to a profitable digital surveillance infrastructure and pushing extra “vaccines” into the arms of each man, lady, and youngster (and doubtless, if they’ll get away with it, additionally into the harmless our bodies on each canine and cat). The Declaration contains the next language:

PP29 (web page 5):

“Welcome the launch of the Pandemic Fund in November 2022, to strengthen national health emergency preparedness, response and resilience in low-income and middle-income countries and recall that financing effective national, regional and global health emergency preparedness will require approximately US$ 30 billion per year, outside current Official Development Assistance levels;”

OP2 (web page 6):

“Ensure the timely, sustainable and equitable access to pandemic-related products, including vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics and call on the World Health Organization to coordinate this with relevant partners, ensuring coherence with the ongoing discussions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body and the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) in Geneva;”

OP32 (web page 11):

“Take measures to address the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation on public health measures as well as people’s physical and mental health, and to counter mis and dis-information, especially on social media platforms, in the context of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response and to foster trust in health systems and vaccine confidence, while recognizing that the effective engagement of stakeholders requires access to timely and accurate information;”

OP38 (web page 12):

“Call also for the improvement of routine immunization, vaccination and outreach capacities, including by providing evidence-based information on countering vaccine hesitancy, and expand vaccine coverage to prevent outbreaks as well as the spread and re-emergence of communicable diseases, including for vaccine-preventable diseases already eliminated as well as for ongoing eradication efforts, such as for poliomyelitis;”

OP39 (web page 12):

“Mobilize domestic public resources as the main source of financing for pandemic prevention preparedness and response, through political leadership, consistent with national capacities, and expand pooling of resources allocated to health, identify new sources of revenue and improve the efficiency of public financial management;”

OP44 (web page 13):

“Call also for the conclusion in 2024 of the negotiations of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body in Geneva, of an ambitious and legally binding convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, with a view to adoption under Article 19 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization, or under other provisions of the Constitution of the World Health Organization as may be deemed appropriate by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, to strengthen the pandemic prevention, preparedness and response spectrum and inviting all other initiatives to support this central endeavor, and for the conclusion in 2024 of the negotiations of the Working Group on International Health Regulations Amendments (2005), to provide support to all the health and health-related measures necessary to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease.”

The Declaration has been analyzed in nice element (together with motion gadgets) by James Roguski right here.

Amendments to International Health Regulations

International Health Regulations² had been initially adopted in 1969. As described on the Door to Freedom, the World Health Organization members adopted a set of ideas termed the International Health Regulations (IHR) in 1969 to information the conduct of countries throughout well being emergencies affecting a couple of nation, particularly malaria and smallpox. The IHR was amended in 2005. The WHO states:

“The International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders.”

There are two units of IHR Amendments that we have to take note of. One set was adopted in May 2022 on the Seventy-Fifth World Health Assembly (pages 59-62 of the PDF). The deadline for the United States to reject them is December 1, 2023.

Another set of Amendments was submitted by 94 international locations round September 2022. The final publicly out there draft was printed in February 2022, we’re saved at nighttime as to what the actual newest draft appears like. That ultimate draft of these Amendments must be formally submitted by an inside committee round January 2024 to be adopted in May 2024 (or in order that they hope).

Let’s have a look at the convoluted Amendments plot in additional element. International Health Regulations are legally binding however initially, the language of the Regulations didn’t ask for an excessive amount of. The member states at the moment are required to observe their epidemiological scenario and report qualifying developments to the WHO. If performed actually and with out overreach, one may argue that it’s a smart factor.

Like it’s with the whole lot in life although, the satan is within the element. Let us use a metaphor. Membership within the WHO and being legally sure by their regulation are like a wedding. One may say that marriage is an efficient factor. Yes, it could possibly be — however what in case your partner is abusive? Then it’s clearly a nasty factor. Same with the WHO.

It is gorgeous to have a sincere worldwide physique serving to with numerous issues of public well being. Yes, it’s pretty if that’s truly what’s occurring. But if as an alternative of being an sincere group, they’re a mob that’s operating infinite cash laundering schemes for numerous rich people and consistently making an attempt to stay needles into folks’s arms whereas figuring out that the merchandise they’re making an attempt to inject could also be inflicting hurt, then the story removed from pretty. It is then not pretty in any respect.

So, we’ve been buzzing alongside, after which in January 2022, the United States submitted plenty of nefarious Amendments to 13 IHR Articles that, upon some show of discontent and noise raised by the African and another member states ended up “disappearing” and going nowhere.

Instead, in May 2022, extra innocuous amendments (to 5 Articles) had been adopted.³ The Amendments that ended up being adopted in May 2022 had been submitted simply a few days earlier than they had been adopted, regardless of the requirement to submit them not less than 4 months upfront. Here is the way it all went down:

James Roguski wrote a superb evaluation of the Amendments adopted in May 2022:

Executive Summary:

“Since the adoption of the amendments on May 27, 2022 (during the 75th World Health Assembly), no signatures by any Presidents or Prime Ministers have been obtained and no approval by the Senate, Congress or any Parliament has been obtained in order to “ratify” the amendments to the International Health Regulations. Such approval is NOT wanted.”

In James’ opinion, the truth that legally binding amendments had been adopted with none mainstream publicity or nationwide authorized oversight is a disastrous scenario. Many of us agree.

Another Set of IHR Amendments Set To Be Adopted in 2024

A model new assortment of amendments is ready to be adopted in May 2024. Door to Freedom:

“A complete of 307 amendments had been proposed throughout 2022 by 94 member nations [around September 2022]. The proposed amendments had been first made publicly out there in mid-December, 2022 and had been republished on February 6, 2023.

The proposed Amendments would permit the W.H.O. Director-General to imagine the authority to direct healthcare world wide every time he declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. He has already declared 3 (for Ebola, COVID-19 and monkeypox) throughout his six years in workplace. Among the brand new provisions within the proposed IHR amendments are the next:

Furthermore, the present draft IHRs embrace no particular standards for the Director-General of W.H.O. to declare a public well being emergency of worldwide concern (PHEIC). A declaration may even be made with out the consent of the concerned nations. And there aren’t any provisions that make W.H.O. officers accountable for his or her actions.

Equally regarding, a PHEIC declaration could be issued for merely the potential for a public well being emergency, and the emergency powers could be prolonged past the tip of the emergency.

The proposed IHR amendments increase the opportunity of a worldwide well being dictatorship, known as on the whim of the W.H.O. management or the whim of the W.H.O.’s main funders. Why the W.H.O. ought to tackle these powers, when its efficiency throughout COVID-19 was removed from stellar, is a vital query.

The proposed amendments will probably be thought of for adoption on the 77th World Health Assembly over the past week of May, 2024.”

Dr. Nass just lately wrote that “the WHO’s proposed amendments will Increase man-made pandemics.”

And right here is an summary of the 307 proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations which can be at the moment being negotiated by the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations by James Roguski:

The downside is that we don’t know what’s contained within the present draft. If adopted, the brand new Amendments have the potential to formally erode the already wobbly nationwide sovereignty and allow the richest folks of the world to legally use the WHO as a entrance for his or her merciless cash scams that play with folks’s lives prefer it’s good ol’ feudal occasions once more. Am I even barely enthusiastic about neufeudalism? No.

“Pandemic Treaty”

The fourth monitor is the WHO CA+ Framework Convention. This monitor (previously referred to as “Pandemic Treaty”) was initiated in December 2021. It has to do with creating a brand new worldwide authorized framework that might theoretically coordinate the actions of various member states however in follow, would probably coordinate more cash laundering schemes at our expense. James Roguski writes on Door to Freedom:

“In response to what is essentially an international trade dispute, a special session of the World Health Assembly decided on December 1, 2021 to create an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) to launch a process to develop an historic global accord under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

“Article 19 of the WHO Constitution provides the World Health Assembly with the authority to adopt conventions or agreements on any matter within WHO’s competence. The INB will submit its outcome for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024. The sole instrument established under Article 19 to date is the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.”⁴

“In early April 2022, a total of 33,884 public comments were received by the WHO. Over 99% of the comments voiced opposition to the idea of a “Pandemic Treaty.”⁵

In September 2022, a number of hundred video submissions had been obtained by the WHO. The majority of the movies submitted by people voiced opposition to the thought of a “Pandemic Treaty.”⁶

The INB has held 5 official conferences and has printed a Working Draft,⁷ a Conceptual Zero Draft,⁸ a Zero Draft⁹ and a Bureau’s Text.¹⁰ The controversial “compilation text,” which is purported to incorporate roughly 200 pages of textual content proposed by the member nations, has not been made out there to the general public.”

The present drafts go about usual, usual: surveillance, infrastructure, tackling “misinformation,” and vaccines.

We are taking a look at a multi-prong, very tragic, and very corrupt military-grade marketing campaign to chain and subjugate the folks of the world in a brand new means (along with the previous means). The novel characteristic is the usage of digital know-how to tag us, to surveil us, to restrict our motion and our entry to “old normal” meals and medicines that work whereas forcing numerous procedures on us that may maim. Shame on them. Shame on them.

The “Swine Flu” Precedent and Long-Term Planning

I wrote concerning the planning methods across the time when the details about the “Pandemic Treaty” was first popping out:

“Thing is, the WHO already tried to pull off a huge vaccine-selling health crisis more than ten years ago but it didn’t quite work. The vaccine-selling part did work very well because they managed to activate the purchasing agreements — but the “scaring the public” half form of “flopped” that point round.

All that occurred was that the pandemic was solemnly declared, the agreement-participating counties bought comparatively massive batches of subpar vaccines (see “narcolepsy fiasco”), after which your complete factor went away.

Here is a 2010 Forbes article that claims: “From the beginning the World Health Organization’s actions have ranged from the dubious to the flagrantly incompetent.” And right here is the report by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, titled, “The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed”:

“The rapporteur considers that some of the outcomes of the pandemic, as illustrated in this report, have been dramatic: distortion of priorities of public health services all over Europe, waste of huge sums of public money, provocation of unjustified fear amongst Europeans, creation of health risks through vaccines and medications which might not have been sufficiently tested before being authorised in fast-track procedures, are all examples of these outcomes.”

From the British Medical Journal:

“WHO for years had defined pandemics as outbreaks causing “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” however in early May 2009 it eliminated this phrase — describing a measure of severity — from the definition.”

Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had performed paid work for pharmaceutical corporations that stood to achieve from the steering they had been making ready. These conflicts of curiosity have by no means been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its dealing with of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.”

“A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered proof that raises troubling questions on how WHO managed conflicts of curiosity among the many scientists who suggested its pandemic planning, and concerning the transparency of the science underlying its recommendation to governments.

Was it acceptable for WHO to take recommendation from consultants who had declarable monetary and analysis ties with pharmaceutical corporations producing antivirals and influenza vaccines?”

And here’s a 2019 lecture by Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, on the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference. At round 13 minutes in, he brags about how he “misused the fact that that the top, top football … soccer clubs in Belgium inappropriately and against all agreements vaccinated … they made their soccer players priority people.” The viewers laughs.”

And talking of long-term planning, the U.S. “health response” of 2020 was made attainable partially because of the “pandemic preparedness” plans developed throughout Bush, when nobody sane was even contemplating the opportunity of such issues. They do plan upfront!

WHO Is Deeply Corrupt

Here is a really transient look at simply how corrupt the World Health Organization is:

Rather than placing public well being first, akin to pushing for security research into vaccination, WHO’s historical past clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and different industries. WHO, as an illustration, has downplayed the well being results attributable to the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe, stating that solely 50 deaths had been straight attributable to the incident and “a total of up to 4,000 people could eventually die of radiation exposure” from the catastrophe.11

WHO signed an settlement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is “promoting peaceful use of atomic energy,” in 1959, making it subordinate to the company in relation to ionizing radiation.

WHO’s response to the Fukushima radiation catastrophe in 2011 was additionally criticized, with proof of a high-level coverup.12

WHO as soon as once more downplayed the dangers, stating “the predicted risks are low and no observable increases in cancer rates above baseline rates are anticipated.”13

WHO additionally obtained greater than $1.6 million from opioid big Purdue from 1999 to 2010 and used industry-supported opioid knowledge to include into its official pro-opioid tips. According to the Alliance of Human Research Protection, WHO’s collaboration with Purdue led to expanded opioid use and international habit.14

Due to its acceptance of personal cash, a evaluation within the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy went as far as to say the corruption of WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time,” significantly because it pertains to WHO’s drug suggestions — together with its “list of essential medicines” — which it believes is biased and never dependable.15

There is a superb documentary known as, “TrustWHO.” If you haven’t seen it, it’s nicely value testing.

Conclusion

It is de facto shameful what they’re making an attempt to do. They are bullying us, making an attempt to power our lips to maneuver in settlement with their raping methodologies, they’re making an attempt to make us say that we would like it, that we love them, that we undergo them, and that we settle for their new, ever-changing, and upside-down definitions of our sacred phrases. They are attempting to homicide the soul.

They are bullies. They are attempting to equip their digital raping stations with shiny language about fairness and human rights. They are turning some folks into zombies, and they’re weaponizing the brand new zombies in opposition to the individuals who refuse to be zombified.

They are attempting to show the folks into silhouettes whose ft aren’t touching the bottom and whose heads are disconnected from their necks, like this this COVID vaccine advert:

Don’t allow them to do this to you. Don’t let anybody do this to you. Don’t let anybody, below any circumstance, disconnect you out of your soul.

About the Author

To discover extra of Tessa Lena’s work, remember to try her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.