That wasn’t Google I/O — it was Google AI

0
270
That wasn’t Google I/O — it was Google AI


Three years in the past, the corporate pressured out Timnit Gebru, the co-lead of its moral AI crew, primarily over a paper that raised issues in regards to the risks of huge language fashions. Gebru’s issues have since develop into mainstream. Her departure, and the fallout from it, marked a turning level within the dialog in regards to the risks of unchecked AI. One would hope Google realized from it; from her. 

And then, simply final week, Geoffrey Hinton introduced he was stepping down from Google, largely so he’d be free to sound the alarm bell in regards to the dire penalties of fast developments in AI that he fears might quickly allow it to surpass human intelligence. (Or, as Hinton put it, it’s “quite conceivable that humanity is just a passing phase in the evolution of intelligence.”) 

And so, I/O yesterday was a far cry from the occasion in 2018, when the corporate gleefully demonstrated Duplex, showcasing how Google Assistant might make automated calls to small companies with out ever letting the folks on these calls know they had been interacting with an AI. It was an unbelievable demo. And one which made very many individuals deeply uneasy.

Again and once more at this 12 months’s I/O, we heard about accountability. James Manyika, who leads the corporate’s expertise and society program, opened by speaking in regards to the wonders AI has wrought, notably round protein folding, however was fast to transition to the methods the corporate is considering misinformation, noting how it could watermark generated photos and alluding to guardrails to stop their misuse. 

There was a demo of how Google can deploy picture provenance to counter misinformation, debunking a picture search successfully by displaying the primary time it (within the instance on stage, a faux photograph purporting to indicate that the moon touchdown was a hoax) was listed. It was a bit of little bit of grounding amidst all of the awe and marvel, working at scale. 

And then … on to the telephones. The new Google Pixel Fold scored the largest applause line of the day. People like devices.

The telephone might fold, however for me it was among the many least mind-bending issues I noticed all day. And in my head, I stored returning to one of many earliest examples we noticed: a photograph of a lady standing in entrance of some hills and a waterfall

Magic Editor erased her backpack strap. Cool! And it additionally made the cloudy sky look much more blue. Reinforcing this, in one other instance—this time with a baby sitting on a bench holding balloons—Magic Editor as soon as once more made the day brighter after which adjusted all of the lighting within the images so the sunshine would look extra pure. More actual than actual.

How far will we wish to go right here? What’s the top purpose we’re aiming for? Ultimately, will we simply skip the holiday altogether and generate some fairly, fairly footage? Can we supplant our recollections with sunnier, extra idealized variations of the previous? Are we making actuality higher? Is all the pieces extra lovely? Is all the pieces higher? Is this all very, very cool? Or one thing else? Something we haven’t realized but?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here